Blazichaos's page

Hello! Im a GM whose starting a kingmaker game soon, and a loooooong time ago, I remember coming across a document which looked amazing to set up the scene around the Stolen lands.

A big part that appealed to me is it changed how starting a kingdom worked, instead of just getting resources, you have to talk to a bunch of different politcal people/parties, each with their own expectations/obligations and (often secret) motivations in order to gain resources to found the kingdom. Some parties who would give you considerable resources to have their religion as the main/only one, others wanted your loyalty while others wanted you to simply not take the deal with another group. Seemed like a really good way to get the party into the "local" (on a massive kingdom level of course) politics of Golorion. But for the love of Iomedae I can't find the damn document again and was wondering if what I described rings a bell for anyone.

I was just wondering what everyone thought about the Exocortex for the Mechanic. I think it's certainly better than the other choices Druids and Rangers got in Pathfinder and it certainly has useful aspects in my opinion. Although I can see how it relys on the GM if you want to use its hacking aspect a lot.

I'm reasonably new to Pathfinder but i'm pretty sure I have the gist of it. But recently a friend of mind has started a campaign with the advance players guide and I decided to play as a oracle for the healer. And now the oracle is essentially banned in my other friends games because it's "OP", the DM has let me still play the oracle.

But I want to ask is the oracle OP? To me it seems to have enough downfalls to make it around balanced with the limited amount of spells being a spontaneous caster (especially compared to a cleric) gets his 2nd level spells at level 4 (instead of level 3) to even out the mystery that he get's.

So from the wise sage/veterans of pathfinder I ask. Is the oracle OP?