Lifedragn wrote:
You are adorable. I will save you for our Lords first day of glorious slaughter on this 'kingdom' or rivers. Please send me your measurements so I might custom fit your chains for maximum chafing. We might be lapdogs for a time, but only so we are closer to tear out our owners throats. We should talk Hobs.
Duffy wrote:
I said no such thing. Those that are paying attention would see that multiple guilds lost members when the hand increased. There are a few weeks left to play out, and we have had several enticing offers from other guilds to join them and work, out of sight so to speak. Or not so out of sight in our current favorite. If we cannot attain our goals in one fashion we shall choose another. We like Q, for reasons some will clearly not understand. The current occupants are welcome to stay if they wish, either by choice or in chains, but they have not seen fit to respond to my very generous offer.
I will be more through next time around. I presumed someone would have caught any error in calculation given the general 'nerdiness' we all share. But it appears the sheet is close enough, but does not account for the bonus added for the current week, which is done previous to seeing if you keep your spot for the week. Also how will it be rated from here on in. According to the ranking listed, or according to members of guilds holding land. So in week 7, you take the guilds currently holding the 30 hexes and rank them according to raw membership. Apply a hunker down bonus according to their position, and then resort them in order of modified membership and then start looking at the draft lists.
.... awesome.
So for week 7 their maximum possible hunker down bonus will be 111%. The sheet actually said probable week 6 bonus was 72% (it has been updated to week 7), which is why I recalled enough people to beat it by more than a fraction of a number. Its still incorrect as its not reflecting the 'probable' bonus, but the current bonus. Which gets the hunker down added before comparing numbers.
How does a hunker down bonus from before week 4 apply?
Obviously you are adding the bonus previous to them actually defending and staying in their spot. Which the sheet does not do.
My apologies, Try that. Also how did they even get a hunker down bonus that high, they moved spots up until week 4.
that and if you are counting hunker down into placement, they are in 19th, which is only 9%... so....???
Then this sheet is wrong with its hunker down bonus number? Because we should have gotten Q, even if their hunker down bonus was 87% 8*1.87 = 14.96.
Hand of Abraxas
Leadership:
Downfall, yours, mine, the worlds.
Find us brothers and sisters, and let us begin the worlds downfall. |