| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Hello. I am posting here to inform the paizo.com community that our flagship product, Seven Days at Ranger Fort, has been granted the use of the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Compatibility License. That means, we can now advertise our module as being 100% Pathfinder compatible. Our custom framework of macro buttons, hyperlinks, and helpful information with every click of every button makes it perfect for you even if you have never played the Pathfinder RPG. But, in reality, Seven Days at Ranger Fort is the most comprehensive, complete and canonical Pathfinder compatible module ever made specifically for the VTT at roll20.net or anywhere else.
From characters, traits and feats to rituals and custom items (both mundane and magical) everything in Seven Days at Ranger Fort follows the rules provided by the game publishers at Paizo. We love PF. We love the power of the virtual tabletop. Therefore, we made this module for everyone who feels the same as we do. So, if you are looking for an epic length adventure to start your players on their journey from 1st level, please consider supporting us (and the PF hobby) by purchasing a copy for yourself. Seven Days at Ranger Fort is available exclusively as a "one-click" download from roll20.net.
Thank you,
Rick R.
Lead Writer, Lighthouse Keeper Games
"Its canonical..! Its canonical..! Its canonical..!"
In this context, we use the word as a metaphor for the complete, authoritative work that is Pathfinder. My point being that "rules lawyers" will continue playing PF1 for a long time to come and will want modules that take advantage of everything from the core books to the last few published supplements.
Our goal was to create a module that takes all of these awesome rules into virtual table top. I figure, if you can please the rules lawyers and add enough character depth for the rest of us, we can all enjoy an epic length module good for anyone who loves PF.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Sure.
The point Rysky was trying to make is that in RPG terms, "canonical" is generally applied to setting lore, not to rules. Your usage is technically correct from a linguistic standpoint, but it misleading in the context of games.