Spoiler free question about running the "All for Immortality" Series

[nosig]

Please avoid posting anything in this thread that should be "Spoiler-ed" - as I need to ask a question, but don't want to spoil anything, as I haven't played it yet...

I've NOT played these, but two friends of mine and I were considering splitting running these - with each of us running one of them.

How independent are they? If I prep the second one, is that going to be a major spoiler for me playing #1 & #3?

No need to say why - details is not something I'm looking for with this question. Just a simple "Yeah, it'll ruin the big surprise" or "No problem, they are pretty independent of each other"... would be fine

Thank you very much!

[MisterSlanky]

One GM - do not split. While they are fairly stand-alone, they share a common storyline culminating in the 3rd scenario.

The beginning of the scenario GM briefing outlines pretty much everything that's going on in each of them (Particularly #1).

[nosig]

MisterSlanky wrote:

One GM - do not split. While they are fairly stand-alone, they share a common storyline culminating in the 3rd scenario.

The beginning of the scenario GM briefing outlines pretty much everything that's going on in each of them (Particularly #1).

ah well... thanks. Drat. That's what we were figuring, but we do hate to have to "draw straws" to decide who get's stuck with eating the series...

[MisterSlanky]

nosig wrote:

ah well... thanks. Drat. That's what we were figuring, but we do hate to have to "draw straws" to decide who get's stuck with eating the series...

I am speaking from the two hours of prep work it took for me to ready one encounter - don't draw straws, pick your "best".

[andreww]

Yeah, you definitely want one person running the whole thing. Part 3 took me the best part of a day to get the stat blocks in a form which works for me and to set up the characters on a roll20 table.