combat effects searchable database

[Guurzak]

I massaged the public data on attacks and expendables and uploaded them into a free web database host. If you want to see all of the abilities which can apply a given effect, or which can exploit that effect, just put that effect name (or an adequately unique fragment thereof) into the search box and then change the "template" dropdown to either Standard Effects or Conditional Effects.

Dis dayturbayse am pritty orcy. It's ugly, unfriendly, and not too smart; I'm confident that much better tools will appear as the game and community mature. This will do as an MVP until something more advanced comes along.

clicky

[KarlBob]

Very useful. Thank you.

Sorting by damage factor, it's easy to see why Overdraw is so popular.

[<Tavernhold>Malrunwa Soves]

Very nice. Is there a way I can view more than 5 without needing to scroll?

[Lam]

A lot of the feats are general and used Mage Staff or Mage Wand. Is that an error? Or is intent that all roles can use mage staff/wand as secondary and not be multi-role?

[Guurzak]

Anyone can equip any weapon, and if he has attacks for the weapon trained he can slot them and use them.

It's unlikely that someone pursuing a path as a cleric or fighter or rogue would want to invest in training wizard weapons and cantrips which raise Int and provide Arcane achievements, instead of following their preferred role's natural training path which will give them stats and medals that they actually need. But, nothing's stopping him from doing that if that's what he wants to do.

Malrunwa: Nope, like I said, it's an orcy database: ugly, stupid, and unfriendly. If anyone finds a better free database host online, let me know!

[Nihimon]

Lam wrote:

A lot of the feats are general and used Mage Staff or Mage Wand. Is that an error? Or is intent that all roles can use mage staff/wand as secondary and not be multi-role?

I noticed the same thing. I don't know if it's a bug, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was intentional.

[Stephen Cheney]

Those might become more specific later, but the specificity doesn't actually mean anything right now since the dedication bonuses aren't in. They're general in the sense that all the arcane roles will be able to use them, vs. eventual cantrips that might be wizard, sorcerer, etc. specific. But when I get the tech for it I might slap those with "Arcane" instead of "General" as a term for "This doesn't interfere with the dedication bonus of any arcane role, but it would for a martial or divine role."

[Lam]

Likewise you may want some cleric roles to be divine, and some still specific to cleric (undead affecting feats).

[Guurzak]

Database updated with the new attacks in this week's build.

[Guurzak]

Bumping this to remind myself to update the DB with the most current attack data.

[Guurzak]

Updated.

[TEO Pino]

Thanks for this !

Also, I notice if you need to apply unbalanced to a foe, you need a Mage or Fighter. Seems like something a rogue could do too ...

[Gol Guurzak]

Guurzak wrote:

I'm confident that much better tools will appear as the game and community mature. This will do as an MVP until something more advanced comes along.

As expected, the better tool has now appeared: Please use The Goblinary instead.