Pharasma domains.

[NumenorKing42]

So, it always bothered be that some of Pharasma's most interesting domains seem to be built around necromancy, even though she is completely anti-undeath.

I have toyed with the idea of a Pharasma cleric for a while, but I never got on board with a deity who would grant spells that would then require an atonement for casting.

That being said the issue seems to have been fixed in an obscure blog post:

http://paizo.com/paizo/blog/v5748dyo5lbvp

But is the blog PFS legal? If I print this blog post out and use the alternate domain spells, am I good to go with a Pharasma build that actually makes sense, or do I need to stick to formal publications?

Edit: If this was detailed in a published book am I required to purchase said material to use this alternate spell list?

[RainyDayNinja]

If you look at the sidebar to the right in the Additional Resources page, that's one of two blog posts identified as legal for PFS.

[bugleyman]

RainyDayNinja wrote:

If you look at the sidebar to the right in the Additional Resources page, that's one of two blog posts identified as legal for PFS.

Wow, nice catch.

[NumenorKing42]

Thanks! There it is right in the Additional resources... I don't think I'm the only one to over look that one tiny section all the way at the end. Thanks for pointing out where it is.