| toyrobots |
Can we please pin the Community Created stuff thread at the top of the Rise of the Runelords forum? I go looking for it on a regular basis, and it would help to reduce clutter in other threads generated by requests for material that is already in that thread.
Please?
While we're at it, the GM references should be pinned as well. This stuff adds immensely to the value of the APs and should be the first thing a GM finds if he ventures onto the message-boards.
Mark Moreland
Director of Brand Strategy
|
Can we please pin the Community Created stuff thread at the top of the Rise of the Runelords forum? I go looking for it on a regular basis, and it would help to reduce clutter in other threads generated by requests for material that is already in that thread.
Please?
While we're at it, the GM references should be pinned as well. This stuff adds immensely to the value of the APs and should be the first thing a GM finds if he ventures onto the message-boards.
I second the second request. In any of the forums where adventures or sourcebooks are discussed, having the GM reference threads stickied would be helpful. Problem there is that some product lines like modules, chronicles and PFS aren't divided up into 6 issue blocks and having 20-some stickied articles in each forum would get annoying. Perhaps they could be linked to from the respective product page? As sort of an errata document/discussion?
| toyrobots |
You know there is a nice search button at the top too.
It's not really for me, though. It's for the people who make threads inquiring after the existence of things in the CCS thread. It should be one of the first things you see when visiting an AP forum.
I've just bookmarked the crucial stuff, but I had to be a troll for months to become aware of it all. Not all of those threads are equal in terms of utility, and the most useful ones should stay at the top as per internet convention.
| Charles Evans 25 |
The GM references stickying has been requested before; indeed on this thread - *link* - Vic Wertz promised it would be done at some point:
tdewitt274 wrote:I checked with James Jacobs, and he's ok with it. Stickying is a bit of a chore, but we'll do it in the coming days.Watcher wrote:Point taken, Vic. But having the ones that exist stickied, as Watcher said, would be beneficial. :)Vic Wertz wrote:
While I appreciate everyone's enthusiasm for the products, personally, I'm not real keen on having threads exist in December that are going to be empty until next July.
A compelling point Vic.
But how about having the tdewitt errata threads that exist in active Adventure Paths (like Runelords, Crimson Throne, and Second Darkness) stickied within their respective sections?
I can see not wanting to do that with future products, but...
Alas, he has yet to have fulfilled that promise.