Ain't It Cool? (Reviews!)

[David Marks]

This link gives a pretty nice review of 4E in my mind. Good and bad, so hopefully no one will doubt his veracity. :)

Here is a compilation of responses to questions regarding the review. Still digesting them, but thought you guys would want 'em.

Cheers! :)

[Charles Evans 25]

David Marks wrote:

This link gives a pretty nice review of 4E in my mind. Good and bad, so hopefully no one will doubt his veracity. :)

Here is a compilation of responses to questions regarding the review. Still digesting them, but thought you guys would want 'em.

Cheers! :)

I didn't notice Massawyrm post anything critical about 4E. He made some noises about being a little disappointed that some things were apparently being deferred to later rulebooks, and expressed some grouches over two of the pieces of artwork in the Monster Manual, but I noticed nothing critical, and he admitted that he was a fan of the edition. It reminded me very much of Clark's review which Asmodeur posted on the other thread.

Edit:
*Link to Asmodeur's thread*

[David Marks]

Did I? (Post Clark's review that is. I forget.)

Yes, the review definitely has a positive angle to the whole thing ... as Massawyrm says, he is a fan. But I do think he was trying to be honest and give as balanced a review as he could. Not all reviews can be 100% neutral ... at that point exactly what is the purpose of the review?

Cheers! :)

Edit: I didn't think I had posted that thread!

[Charles Evans 25]

David Marks wrote:

Did I? (Post Clark's review that is. I forget.)

Yes, the review definitely has a positive angle to the whole thing ... as Massawyrm says, he is a fan. But I do think he was trying to be honest and give as balanced a review as he could. Not all reviews can be 100% neutral ... at that point exactly what is the purpose of the review?

Cheers! :)

Edited my post. It was Asmodeur. You responded to it though.

[David Marks]

Hehe, no problem. I post a lot here.

Cheers! :)