tesuji2's page

Hello everyone. I recently came across this thread https://paizo.com/threads/rzs2kx8s?Full-attack-multiple-targets and posts by "midknight" and "Name Violation" that make a couple of interesting claims. midknight says that you don't have to decide to full attack or not until after you see the result of your first strike. Name Violation says that you can even wait to twf or not as long as you have applied the appropriate penalty to the first attack as if you were going to twf.

I was wondering if both of these are accurate and if the twf logic would apply to rapid shot.

Thanks for your help.

Thanks for the reply. What you said makes sense. I'd like to point out that we are not allowed to keep any of the old gear.

So, I recently had an issue with a ruling my GM made about a teamwork feat I had taken. I got pretty upset about so I definitely need to learn to chill out and just accept the GM's ruling. The GM isn't going to change the ruling so I am not trying to persuade him or anything I was just wondering what you all think about how it should be handled.

Another party member and I had taken a teamwork feat but then the other person decided to switch classes after dying. They got to make a new character at level with full character wealth for the level and basically pick whatever they want in terms of gear and feats and so on. I was now stuck with a completely useless feat and told that I would have to pay to retrain the feat and find 5 days of down time before I could retrain it. I know that this makes sense RAW but I felt like I was being punished by the other persons decision to change classes and feats.

What do you all think about this. Was there a better way to handle it?

In any case, I appreciate your input.

Hello, Im a bit confused about using metamagic rods.

If I have two quicken metamagic rods can I quicken spells using the rods a total of six times per day or only three times per day? Does it make a difference if I have a quicken metamagic rod and a greater quicken metamagic rod?

Hi all, Tesuji2's GM here ~

So yeah, I compared the Swashbuckler to the rogue and fighter (and honestly also Paladin and Barbarian) -- I view bothering to compare it to full spell-casters as completely out, since their basically in a different league.

So some 10th level characters I found pre-made on the forums
** spoiler omitted **
** spoiler omitted **...

Thanks so much to everyone who responded. That was a lot of interesting information.

That aside, most of what my gm said is accurate. we do kinda have a barbarian of mwahaha death in the party though. He is 5th level and has a +19 to damage. Pretty nice imo. Also a couple of the players in our group are smart people who have a many years of experience with dnd/pathfinder even if they aren't trying to minmax at the moment. Considering what I have heard here I am not too worried about outstripping everyone myself.

Still though, we have a good GM who runs interesting games and I respect that he can run the game the way he thinks is best. I know we all appreciate him going to the trouble of running the game for us every week.

Hello Everyone,nice to meet you all. I have been playing pathfinder for over a year now and I frequent the message boards but this is my first post. I was hoping someone could help me with an issue.

I was looking through the advanced class guide and I really like the Swashbuckler class. I have wanted to play a class like this ever since I saw the duelist prestige class but my GM and I both have some concerns about how powerful the Swashbuckler is. My GM thinks the Swashbuckler is more powerful then the classes in the Core Rule-book and APG. He says he would let me play the class if we changed the hit die to d8 and the BAB to 3/4. I am uncertain myself and we would both like get a better feel for the Swashbuckler.

I was hoping Some of you could give your opinions about the class. Thank you very much for your help :)

(Normally Allowed book list: Core, APG, Ultimate Magic, Ultimate Combat, Ultimate Equipment -- with a few banned things from those) (Synthesis summoners for examples)