andy mcdonald 623 wrote:
Andrew Christian wrote:
Has anyone considered that until we hear from Mike or John on this, that we assume its grandfathered in?
I don't mean to be a pest, but why would we assume that? (no sarcasm intended). The rule did not change, it was clarifed though. Is that the normal approach?
Andy
I'm new, but considering the wide range of opinions on how this should be handled, leaving things alone and waiting for an official ruling seems like it would be the best course. No point going through work to correct this when we might find out the "correction" was wrong.