|
mrofmist wrote:
My DM might let me use Feats from 3.5 =) My sad solution was to take Improved Feint, thinking Greater Feint might come in handy later... but I'd go for Ranged Flanking and then Ranged Threat, if he's cool with it =) Thanks for the suggestion! Really, everyone, thank you all for your help! My character did great in combat this past Saturday. Striking targets from a great distance is fabulous =)
rkraus2 wrote:
That's a good idea =) Is there an addendum to Grease somewhere that explains the flat-footed bit? The spell description I have isn't totally clear =| 10ft sq, 10 DC Reflex or fall, move make save, don't move not flat-footed. So, if someone moves in/through the grease, they become flat-footed *and* have to make the save?
Meta-gamingly, not allowing a bow/crossbow to benefit from a flank is ridiculous =) Just ask Legolas =P Or that guy behind you with the gun whose buddy is in front of you with a knife. Just sayin' ;) Anyhow =) I *really* appreciate all the help from everyone! I'm going to load up Hero Lab and take another look.
Benchak the Nightstalker wrote:
See, I look at something like PBM or Stabbing Shot and think 'Oh, yah! Definitely threatening. Definitely.' I guess it's one of those game mechanics I'll have to accept? [sigh] Like I said, it's my 1st Rogue'ish bow-user, so I wanted to... well... game the system as much as possible =) All my other friends do it, so I thought I'd give it a shot. Now I'm thinking I should do something else =| I've pretty much got a free character to throw in the 9th lvl slot. I want something Chaotic Neutral, so I figured a versatile ranged guy would be a nice change. I'm not used to making a character for the purpose of raining death upon my opponents. It's a new direction =P So, if I can't work it, other than the Monk option, what would you all suggest? I'm all ears for an unrealistic build or alteration =)
mdt: I see. Yes. I can understand that a person wouldn't threaten *until* they get PBM. I think once PBM hits the field, and AoO is taken out of the picture, that's pretty threatening =) But, if I need to threaten them some other way (if my DM won't go for the PBM = threaten = Flank = Sneak equation), you think merely having armored spikes or Improved UA is enough to make the equation legal? [thinks] This character is important. I'm retiring my Paladin to soothe some gameplay conflict, and I want this new character to excel killing and not dying =P I always play characters that have lots of issues, motivations, and conflict... but our game lends it self to a little more slay than that... so I want a character I can surprise people with =) I'm willing to change him up to make it work!
I need help tweaking a character for a game tomorrow night. Won't you help a guy out? Here's the 1st question: A character with Point Blank Master can take a shot with a bow against someone who threatens them w/o provoking an attack of opportunity... so why wouldn't they a) get the +2 Flank bonus (they don't have a hand-to-hand weapon, but I guarantee they threaten their opponent) and b) be able to Sneak Attack the enemy because they *do* threaten them because they don't provoke an an AoO and *should* get the Flank bonus? Seriously. It's my first bow-wielding character, and I'm really curious about this. Flank specifically says engaged in melee as a requirement, but I can be face-to-face with you, engaged in combat, with a missile weapon... and I could totally get a Sneak on you if you were distracted by another person in real life. Here's the follow-up info: He's a 4th lvl Fighter, 5th lvl Rogue. He has: Improved Initiative
His Will is terrible. It's a 9 with the Iron Will bonus. Stats are: Str 16
All the normal skills (I assume) are maxed (Stealth, Acro, etc.) I want him to be absolutely lethal, but I wanted a range attack that didn't suffer if I got close (hence Point Blank Master). I just don't understand why, realistically, seriously, I wouldn't be able to Sneak, with a bow, while Flanking an enemy. Suggestions? Help? =) |