TGMaxMaxer wrote:
That seems to be the way everyone reads it, because that is what they expect it to do.
The actual text does what you originally thought, per RAW.
However, with the atrocious editing, proofing, and all around bad writing of the ACG, it's just another case of what they wrote not adding up to what they (we guess) meant, as the actual RAW would be extremely potent for a FCB.
This just came up in my game last night. It does seem broken, as written. Was there ever an errata note on this?
