imaginary pie's page

imaginary pie wrote:

The dominant sexual orientation has to be heterosexual, or the species

would die out.

Incorrect. The only thing for the species to remain viable is that births equal or exceed deaths. How that's accomplished is irrelevant. It does not require constant and unwavering heterosexual behavior to accomplish that goal.

I agree with you. Our differences appear mostly to be with semantics.

The dominant sexual orientation has to be heterosexual, or the species
would die out.

The persistent homosexual orientation, in our species, reveals that our
genome is an amalgamation of functions and subroutines. Sometimes a
person's sex and gender don't match up -- that's ok.

Just think of homosexuality as another expression (mode) of being human. And being
human, it must be given proper esteem.

I guess what I'm saying is homosexuality is genetic.

Furthermore, our need for sex is on par with our need for food. So, put a bunch of men
in a cage or a bunch of women in a cage plus some time, and some of them will have sex
with each other. Even though they know they are of the same sex.

This is ok too, because sex is built into us. Anything humans do is "human behavior".

The dominant sexual orientation has to be heterosexual, or the species
would die out.

The persistent homosexual orientation, in our species, reveals that our
genome is an amalgamation of functions and subroutines. Sometimes a
person's sex and gender don't match up -- that's ok.

Just think of homosexuality as another expression (mode) of being human. And being
human, it must be given proper esteem.

I guess what I'm saying is homosexuality is genetic.

Furthermore, our need for sex is on par with our need for food. So, put a bunch of men
in a cage or a bunch of women in a cage plus some time, and some of them will have sex
with each other. Even though they know they are of the same sex.

This is ok too, because sex is built into us. Anything humans do is "human behavior".

Why is there no adventure path dealing with the end of all Golarion?

This seems like low hanging fruit. Doomsday predictions are almost
commonplace nowadays. Hardly a week goes buy, it seems, without
some new warning of worldwide catastrophe.

------------------

When and how will the human race die out?

The subject is a matter of heated controversy on campuses
and in laboratories across the nation. Interviews with
astronomers, geophysicists, biologists, and health experts
disclose that they believe total human extinction is not
necessarily as distant a possibility as many of us would
choose to think.

While most scientists regard as remote the likelihood of
human extinction in the near future, it is real enough, some
assert, that governments should start seeking ways to limit
the risks. As the earth hurtles through space at 1.3 million
miles an hour, there is the chance of catastrophe from both
cosmic and terrestrial causes, but the damage might be
reduced by timely precautions.