I shall join in here too because I am a bisexual.
I have never been assaulted, either physically or verbally for being bisxual and I´ve had great support from friends, boyfriend and family. Granted some in my family don't know I am a bisexual. Pretty sure my dad doesn't know it. But in general it has been rather drama-free with my sexiality. Just down to earth really, so I don´t have much to share with you guys. But hello to all!
Orthos wrote:
I am a Tumblr user myself, and I am almost afraid to ask how it has become like Tumblr? Are we talking "Omg! tag your s*~! because I get super triggered by this!!" Or more in the as-sensitive-as-a-toothache-aggressive-SJW-crap? *hides and prays*
1) I really hate elves. I seriously do. 2) I dislike playing spellcasters and all that nitty gritty management of spells, rules around the spells, components and all of that hullabaloo. 3) I am not a fan of Drows either. Too much of a "Unique Snowflake" feel to it for my taste. 4) I dislike evil campaigns. 5) I dislike Eastern stuff too in fantasy games tho I can´t really say why, it just bothers me. I guess it´s how some people hype it up that makes me think "meh" about it. 6) I love rogues and always will. 7) I love ROLEplay instead of ROLLplay. Hell yeah character driven RP is the best ever! 8) Most of Paizo´s Adventure Paths don´t catch my interest. 9) I hate the character designs for the Gnome and the hafling. And I really do mean HATE it. I love Wayne Reynolds art, but those two designs makes me so annoyed. I liked the old D&D designs better. If I make a Gnome or Hafling, I draw them as seen in 3.0 and 3.5. 10) I love Dwarves. 11) I have never multiclassed and never will. Dislike the idea. 12) Don´t really care much about other races than the core races.
Oh dang this sounds like a pickle to be in, must say.
Okay, trying to put on my boring and responsible adult hat here
There can be various reasons to why your GM does this.
2) He doesn't like you getting an advantage over his creature.
3) I know I was going to write something here, but I forgot what it was Damn it. Anyways the best thing you can do is actually sit down, just the two of you and talk it over. Find out where the problem is and why. Make sure you tell him how you feel like with him doing this,, because if it affects you negatively then you have to damn well speak up! if you come to an agreement with him (maybe) learning from this and actually trying to improve himself, well then score! He is trying to get better! if not... then I say leave the table.
TL;DR?
*takes off fancy tophat*
But TV tropes is the most valid source of information on the internet!
Greetings to all on this board :D
I would just like to say that no Nearyn didn't at all get upset with the Inquisitor's choise of word or how he acted the whole sequence out infront of him, as a GM. Now Nearyn is an all honesty a really fair GM. If he thinks we are about to do something horribly wrong he often looks at us very sayingly and asks us if we REALLY do want to undfold our actions. Not only that, he is also a person who loves to get the input from others on how he ran his session each time, and that is why he turn to you amazing guys here on the Paizo froum, to gaine knowledge and to become a better GM, by asking for your guys input and comments :) @8 red wizards as a player at nearyn's table I had to make an account if only to respond to this. I would go ahead and say you clearly don't know Nearyn and that you are making unfair assumptions. He didn't get the least bit upset with the Inquisitor during the session, I should know I was playing the rogue. And to say that he is only posting here to get a pat on the shoulder is just stupid. As said before he more than often post in here because he knows that alot of the people in here can actually come with creative suggestions and he really appreciate it because it helps him to become a better GM and to make the stories much more vivid, colcorful, dynamic and alive. I am saddened by your behavior.
(sorry if I've made some horrible miss-spellings and so) |