Search Posts
What this means is that Bestial Aspect is horribly written. It should be a size increase, to fix the questions of stacking and the die increase, but it's not. The ability IS horribly written! It doesn't actually say bloodline power, instead it says bloodrage power, which would be a barbarian rage power option.
I'll allow it! edit: do you know me or Imbicatus?
Wouldn't BA and INA count as effective size increases? "The same is true of effective size increases (which includes “deal damage as if they were one size category larger than they actually are,” “your damage die type increases by one step,” and similar language). They don’t stack with each other, just take the biggest one. "
I mostly asked this question to have it confirmed on the Paizo site for others looking to maximize natural attacks. Would anyone know of any other ways to increase the potency of natural attacks (other than Magic Fang and Amulet of Mighty Fists...of course)? I'll be using BA for my claws, and then taking INA for my bite once I have it through Dragon Disciple.
I'm building a Bloodrager (Primalist/Rageshaper) with the Draconic bloodline, and also planning on going into Dragon Disciple at level 6. I'm wanting to maximize my claw attack, so I'm wondering if Improved Natural Attack (INA) and Beastial Aspect (BA) stack with one another. My DM is saying that they don't based on this link . He's saying that both are effective size increases. He's allowing Enlarge person to stack with either INA or BA. Here's the link to Beastial Aspect and |
