Greetings
I am requesting an FAQ for the above topic. Here are the reasons I believe that you cannot go invisible whilst under the effects of Glitterdust. Note that various GM's in PFS play have different interpretations. Below are ideas I support.
'When analyzing rules from a RAW perspective, specific trumps general.
The general rule is that invisibility prevents one from being seen and grants several advantages. Glitterdust specifically counters the advantages invisibility confers -- and specifically does so for the duration of the Glitterdust spell.
If invisibility specifically mentioned that it counters the effects of Glitterdust, then casting it again or after being Glitterdusted would allow one to gain the benefits of being invisible. Read Darkness and Daylight to see examples of this sort of wording.
Since invisibility does not provide a specific exception to Glitterdust's power, then subsequent castings do not circumvent Glitterdust's specific power to outline invisible targets.
When arguing RAW, common sense and physics don't factor in.
Glitterdust specifically says it "...outlines invisible things FOR THE DURATION OF THE SPELL." Unless invisibility states that it counters Glitterdust, then even subsequent castings do nothing to prevent Glitterdust from continuing to outline the thing.
Another statement in support of the above position: If the player has a reference on hand, I cede to it. If not, too bad. As far as I'm concerned, RAW is you're covered in magic dust preventing invisibility. It's not like they used Mage Hand to dump ordinary glitter on you. The magic dust is specifically immune to invisibility.'
