axian's page

Also keep in mind the fact that you won't necessarily get all the treasure bundles every adventure. If you only find 7/10 treasure bundles every adventure (Sad, but not unrealistic) at level 3, you would have amassed 75.6 gold. Even without assumptions regarding how much you spend while getting to level 3, I think 75Gp is reasonable...

Would you have more by playing through those levels, yes...but not that much more, and the time savings would be worth it to some.

units where you complete multiple activities, such as spending 7 days retraining and then 1 day Earning Income

A check to Earn Income does not carry beyond the 8-day cycle

The 8 day block of Downtime (for Earned Income) reads pretty clearly to me as a maximum of 8 days, not a minimum of 8 days. Blocking downtime into 8 day (or less) segments is an excellent way of preventing one bad roll from ruining your 24 days of downtime after an AP, or to keep a player from coasting on one good roll for that 24 days.

So for a quest that provides 2 days of Downtime, I have 1 block (2 days) of Downtime I can use. A field-commissioned agent after a scenario has 2 blocks (8 days, 4 days).

I think it means it is reduced from 1d8 + modifier to just modifier. i.e 1d8+3 to 3

I'll go ahead and voice my opinion... I don't really care too much :P

That being said. If it is a matter of rewarding dedication, why was a similar acceleration not done with Novas? If it is a matter of rules knowledge, why would we receive a subsidization from a different system?

In regards to providing a boon based on 1e Stars, I don't have an issue with it provided it has no significant game effect or that there is some way it could be earned by a new player. Perhaps it is an exclusive boon for the first year or two but becomes available at a later date to all...

I really don't care what the format we use for XP, whether it be 3/level or 1000/level, whatever. I only have two requests

(1) We maintain the same rate of leveling. Three scenarios = 1 level
(2) We eliminate fractions. Assuming we keep slow track and quests, etc. the basic unit of measure should be formatted so the minimum reward you can earn is still a whole number. I really dislike have 1/2 XP for slow tracking scenarios. For PFS2 we have the chance to "fix" it, and I hope we do.

I completely agree with point 1. But I don't mind fractions THAT much...I would suggest if they stay they be simple, say a numeric scale of 1, so .5 (1/2) or .2 (1/5) but not .25 (1/4) or .125 (1/8) and certainly not something repeating like 1/3 or 1/6.

If it is a 5 quest pack each quest could be .2 XP and the whole series be 1 XP. The math stays pretty simple, and the numbers small (which seems to be a concern).

But, I would prefer whole numbers, just don't really want to see 6XP/scenarios or 31XP/module or whatever just to have 1XP/quest on slow track.

I like the direction. Might actually have to play a Paladin again. :)

I realize that estimates are not promises, but if I didn't recieve an e-mail yesterday, should I be concerned that I screwed up submitting my application?

EDIT: Nevermind. I've been working nights. It is only Friday just now.

I am also anxiously waiting for the e-mail and concerned that I did something wrong on the application... I guess I will find out today if I did or not.

I don't have any race boons available at the moment, but I do have GenCon 2017 Boon #2 (Mounted Tradition) and #15 (Trophy Hunter).

I'm wanting a Grippli.

Now to begin scheduling SFS games for after GenCon at my FLGS.

I just received my Tier 2 confirmation email.

This will be my first year participating in PFS at GenCon, and I am very much looking forward to it.

Paces back and forth inside the virtual world waiting by the virtual mailbox.

Yes. This exactly.