| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Interesting Betts. You're already dropping the system you've praised litteraly daily on these boards every since it arrived, for 5ED. If 4Ed was that great of a system, as you've suggested so often, why not stick with it? Then you wouldn't have to re-buy all those books you've already shelled out your hard earned dollars for in the 4Ed system?Does anyone have an opinion on what the "ideal" lifespan of a system is?I care less about the amount of time that a system was supported for, and more about the depth of material we receive over the course of its lifespan. Even though 4e has only been out for less than four years, it already has a tremendous amount of material. If I planned on sticking with 4e (I'm planning on switching to 5e, but if), I would have everything I ever need to run 4e games with a fantastic amount of variety for the rest of my life.
The only other consideration would be continued access to the digital tools, which we've heard (preliminarily) will still be available.
Dear KillerGM,
from one Pathfinder player to another:Scott Betts has played and enjoyed a game that we might not like to play ourselves and now he is willing to try another...
what's wrong with that?
leave it alone, please...
Good gaming to you all,
GRU