Belkar Bitterleaf

Zedarflight's page

Organized Play Member. 3 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 1 Organized Play character.


RSS


Yesterday I got an email letting me know that the next book in my Starfinder Subscription is shipping, but I've moved recently and forgot to update the address here. I've updated the address in my subscription, but I can't seem to see how to change the shipping address for this particular pending order.

Thanks a ton.


On my page 304 it appears there was a corner folded over during the printing process, so I'm missing the first part of a few lines of text. Is there anything I should be doing in particular?

Imgur link of picture of corner.
https://i.imgur.com/XBGlDRg.jpg

Thanks for your time.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Mark Seifter wrote:
Torbyne wrote:
With all the thought towards balancing the numbers, how much room was baked in for PCs to optimize or fall into a bad numbers build? It sounds like there is a set assumption, at level X PCs will have Y to hit, W for average damage and Z for ACs, what wiggle room is there for someone who wants enjoys the optimization aspects of the last 17 years?
The goal as much as possible is to not make it opaque how to do well compared to benchmarks in the math, which should make the optimization floor significantly higher. More of the ceiling should hopefully come from finding fun ability combos than it does from finding a feat or magic item buried amongst the others that randomly gave you a +4 to all attack rolls. Not that I don't personally enjoy doing a little archaeology to find things, but I'm a guide writer, so I'm weird; most people would rather not have to do that.

For those people like me who enjoy digging through the books and understanding the details of how the math fits together for some mechanic, where would you suggest we look for new things? (or: What areas of Starfinder's underlying math are different enough to be worth spending some time puzzling out why it works?)