| Yokel60 |
I've been involved in D&D Encounters from March 2010 (when it started) until right before the 5e Playtest around August 2013. I came back in May of this year and started running 5e Encounters on Weds at my local stores back in August using the Hoard of the Dragon Queen Adventure. I've also played about 50 PFS Scenarios since playing in March 2013. I've also played in various Organized Play programs through RPGA, Living Greyhawk, Living Forgotten Realms and recently ran some 13th Age public play too.
I know Erik Mona talked about it in an interview at the beginning of summer that D&D's new edition would bring a lot of new players surging back to try it, and from everything I've seen at our store, it's absolutely true. The biggest issue we have is GMs. We only have two, and the other one prefers 4e so is still running that. I've been running a table of 7 players every week and having to turn some of them away because we don't have another GM at the moment. My experience when 4e Encounters was going is that we had about 4 tables and around 20-25 players on a Wednesday but we always had room for new players. A lot would stay and play for a month or two, then start asking about other games. The issue is that Pathfinder never took hold here because of...a lack of GMs willing to run in stores. There's a lot of home games going on with Pathfinder (including one I'm currently playing in) but you have to go about 35 miles away to find a PFS Game that only plays on Tues and Weds.
I think Encounters was one of the most successful things to come out of 4e. It's a good 2 hour format with an overarching plot that lasts for around 15 weeks that's perfect for the middle of the week for those with day jobs who can't stay out late or for new people to try out the game in little segments.
WOTC is developing both the Encounters and Expeditions (closer to what PFS scenarios are now) and I don't see why Paizo cannot do both. Yes, some players and GMs for PFS will see it as a compromise and probably won't play or run them, but for other players, it would be ideal. I played 3 PFS scenarios over this weekend, and saw a lot of players that normally play PFS playing the Organized Play for the Pathfinder Card Game instead, and at least 3 of them playing were our regular GMs for PFS.
This doesn't have to be a zero sum game. I prefer the hobby to grow and add new players or bring old ones back, and if both WOTC and Paizo have solutions to that, great, I'll point the players to either and let them choose. I'll continue to play both and bring new players into both Pathfinder and D&D 5e. As stated in previous posts, D&D still has the name recognition and can bring players in, and when 4e was being ran at the store, a lot of them went to play Pathfinder. I think that will still happen with 5e, but besides the breadth of options available in Pathfinder due to the fact of it's longevity, 5e and Pathfinder are closer in experience to a lot of players compared to Pathfinder and 4e.
I'd like to see some of the modules or APs broken down into 2 hour segment chunks or maybe going forward, some of the new ones developed that way. For those that play the regular PFS Scenarios, it might be something they'd be interested in or maybe not, but for new players or busy ones that would like to try it, maybe a 2 hour format is warranted.