Yannick Ziener's page

** Pathfinder Society GM. 3 posts (17 including aliases). 15 reviews. No lists. 1 wishlist. 11 Organized Play characters.


RSS


A friend of mine (the "big GM" of the group) made a Discord server where he started DMing society. There we started out as 6 players and slowly accumulated a total of 23 players now with 3 active and one not-so-active DMs. We all know each other more or less well and we do have a core of players who play most of the games and some players who jump in every 2 to 3 weeks. It is very enjoyable and you have way more fun this way than the awkward silence before games with random players.

2/5

Thank you for your answers. In the end I decided to only give them 1 Prestige, since I dislike retconning after the whole session is done, but I will remember this in the future and try to find these issues while reading through the scenario.

2/5

So i just ran the PFS scenario 9-21, In The Grandmasters Name. While this question came up specifically while running it, it is a general question for future DMing as well.
In the scenario it states "To convince Emilio that they are agents of Grandmaster Torch, the PCs must succeed at at least two of the following checks: a DC 19 Disguise check, a DC 19 Bluff check, or a DC 11 Linguistics check to present forged identification documents".
For me this implies that the PCs need to forge these documents if they want to succeed at the linguistics check beforehand or hidden away from Emilio's eyes. A player of mine (our main DM) said that the wording implies that the checks can all be attempted, since there is no word of any prerequisites for it.

What is your take on it? This would be the deciding factor between 1 and 2 prestige points