![]() ![]()
![]() I plan to integrate Ruby Phoenix tournament into book 4 too. In Hongal, the prince(I can't remember his name) celebrate the PC, and 3 days festival will open. and test pc. I plan to replace this festival to tournament. If Pc win the tournament The prince will please and let them go. (also the book suggest the prince's test and it's reward. I think the reward will be replace Ruby Phoenix's reward) ![]()
![]() I assign rightful heir role to one of PC and Ameiko is her kagemusha. At first, rokuro's bloodline is kegemusha's familyline. and he support his master's bloodline carefully at distance. My PC just finished book 1, and realise their fate(especially ameiko and main PC). I expect it make very interesting role points. 1. Ameiko is still key NPC. PC should pretend Ameiko is princess, and protect her. It make the whole adventure's many background keep going. 2. I think protagonist should be PC! in many thread, it told repeatly so I skip it. 3. Ameiko's fate is not fixed. maybe I can make her revolt to PC, after she ascend Minkai's empress. Or in book 5 and 6 somewhere? PC's relation will be make her fate too. ![]()
![]() Axial wrote:
How about fake queen is actually, Demon Minagho herself! I dont like her status, and fate in book 5 either. (she is in prison for purnishment from her Lord)How about change her mythic Trickter about 6. and she has mythic ability proof from divination any sort. and she impersonate paladin's ability. and God is not Omniscient. and her mythic ability prevent it. so Iomedae doesnt know this. Maybe replacing Queen is very recent event, about book 4 period, resulting Minagho's desperate attempt from her continuing failure. Now Queen Galfey is Minagho's husk, and PCs finds this in prison. ![]()
![]() Apparently, Warpriest needs his own UNIQUE flavors.
this is my thoughts for his problem. 1. He is not much better just multiclass Fgt/Clr, and very less for paladin.
here is my suggestion. I always think what the paladin make better is his swift laying on hands. and level base use per day. Likewise, warpriest needs more reliable and quick heal for him and his comrade. He dont needs 6th Lv spell, only needs swift minor buff spell. blessing needs more buff. more passive stable ability will be good. like CL+1, for magic blessing.
![]()
![]() chaoseffect wrote: A Pathfinderized Warforged is really what I want. Alternate racial abilities and logical racial feats are also a huge plus. And when I say "logical racial feats", I mean the complete opposite of Stabbing Shot essentially. I usually try to refrain from personal insults, but whoever decided that needed to be a racial feat is an idiot. There is Android in Inner Sea Bestiary campaign book.. ![]()
![]() chapter 2. there are ghoul army that has disease, undead type, paralyze special ability. according to ultimate campaign, recovering from disease needs stability check. But in this story, they dont have kingdom. so stability check nonsense! or am i missing something? And paralyze saids "Each time the army damages an enemy army, reduce the enemy army's DV by 1" How long does it effect? I assume it last one battle. Is it correct? ![]()
![]() Lord Snow wrote:
Oh~ I feel guilty to my players. My players are not the people who less interested role playing. Maybe it's because previous Serpent skull's terrible memory. From start, PCs and 5 other castaway should survive carnival island. But 5 other NPCs are... like whining child saying 'care for me. care for me~'.
What I want to say is... Dont make NPCs obstacle and XP machine.
Even though PCs make them "hostile", if there is no immediate threat of life from PCs, it will be good to give their aids to party. ![]()
![]() j b 200 wrote: I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on RPing right after the fall with the NPCs. I'm concerened that my players will mostly ignore the NPCs (thus missing about 1/2 the xp in part 1) or will only really interact with them if I spell out "YOU MUST TALK TO THEM TO GET XP!!!" and that might make them feel a little railroaded. Any thougths on a more organic way to really introduce the NPCs? when i was GM the serpent skull, it seems very similiar opening. PC was dropped sudden catastrophe, there are stanger among PCs.Worst of it, the NPC may not coperate PCs. If the NPCs prove their worth to PCs, they should ignored. So I'm gonna skip diplomacy about ther attitude(friendly, unfriendly so on). it will be better, they are from the start friendly. and react properly that. At least, they are more charming and have a good backgound to appeal PCs.
My point is, NPCs should helpful to PCs at their best. ![]()
![]() My player wants to run this adventure 5 paladin. (maybe 4 paladin and something other)
at my first impression is holy XXXX!
I want to listen your opinion... ![]()
![]() If human druid change her form beast by wild shape, now she is Animal Type for ranger's favored enemy ability? or Is she still Humanoid(human)? or Is she Humanoid(human) AND Animal? How about demon changing form through other polymorph effect to human, element, or other thing? Does it still apply paladin's Smite evil? Finally, If demon possess other creature, that possessed creature can be target smite evil ability? ![]()
![]() mplindustries wrote:
Actually, just one 5th level spell can give you total immunity is very nervous me. I always hated Aura of resolve to give you a total immunity from compulsion effects. and true seeing is so common to devil or demon or etc... (and always on!) it just complain. ;( Proper use of spell or item always deserved their action, I think. ![]()
![]() how about WEIRD
If a subject's Fortitude save succeeds, it still takes 3d6 points of damage and is stunned for 1 round. The subject also takes 1d4 points of Strength damage. true seeing can totally negate Weird's effect just because it is illusion school? Does it give you total immunity of illusion? or you can take its second effect stun, strength damage, and 3d6 damage? ![]()
![]() I have queation about Alchemist formula for craft.
or sipping jacket is require amplify elixir (the only alchemist) so, i want to know alchemist's formula isnt match for general item create rule for requirement? |