Search Posts
Because of this feat loss i had a monk that was. Decent, and well now he's okay up until im like wow man i want to play this guy in a scenario/module past level 10 then that bonus it gives doesn't mean a thing because that monster has a +20 to hit me and i cant deflect its one attack, and now I'm praying to my deity that it doesn't hit me!
I am not in favor at all with alignment restrictions. A paladin for example gets quoted constantly for doing the wrong thing even though all Good alignments have their own way of dealing with things. law and good, neutrality and good, and then there's Chaotic Good. Though i did read a long time ago that if you play a monk, and multi-class out of it you don't lose as much as would other classes. A barbarian cant go lawful because it's a contradiction. They are supposed to be Uncivilized idiots with weapons. As per 3.5 which was so stupid. But i think it would be interesting making a lawful neutral barbarian. Not sure how I'd play it but hey. On a final note i have noticed any class that does a crazy act in lawful like a finisher or coup de grace they dont get and flack for it. But o ma gerrrd if its a paladin we lose our minds, which is probably the only reason i would never make a paladin, because people take alignment variation so seriously that its almost to the point where it ruins the game.
There is your answer wind chime power gaming is in the eye of the beholder. I agree with Pan power gaming is in the eye of the beholder. While some play the game to be the strongest others will make the best talker, and weakest combatant. Like for example in PFS i don't care about role playing. In a home game i care about role playing. I don't enjoy meeting up with random people just to role play once. I am in a home game right now playing as a Ranger and while i am sort of power gaming him i am also building him as a smart character because he is a beast, and i will role play him, because i am going around the world stopping a supernatural darkness. Also most people would argue that power gaming isn't always a fun thing i would say well it saves lives rather than role play with people and die with them.
I'm so tired of seeing people complain about classes, and also complain about how they are attached, and or not attached emotionally to their Eidolon. I currently play in a homegame where someone is attached to their Eidolon, and i play in PFS with my best friend who is not attached he plays for different Reasons. If somebody plays something in pfs a way you aren't happy with then owells. Nobody should flip the table just because they are power-gaming. I choose not to really put that much effort into PFS i just play, and go home. But i wanted to get that out of my system because of a current issue i am going through. People argue that a class is over powered. i get that. my Barbarian is Hitting +25, +20, and +15 as for damage i am doing +27 (W/o rolling dice.)Point is (Not dissing eidolons), Compared to my friend who plays the summoner (PFS) I am doing more damage than his pet. Granted if he was hella bent on doing more damage his summons are crazy now considering he can summon Dire Tigers and well they are crazy awesome enough. If people put their minds to the game they are going to break it. Can't Seem to Break a monk though -_- i wish they were full BAB. |
