![]() ![]()
Ok I posted before but I have been reconsidering it and would love to get a build working on this idea. The class is 3.5 so I won't discuss it here, but my name kind of gives it away. Race would be Half-Elf with the alternate racial trait to lose the Skill Focus and gain a Exotic Weapon Prof. For a Gnomish weapon (Also 3.5 so I won't post it here) Flaw Feat: (3.5 Feat to obtain a familiar)
Does this look ok?
Bard gives 1/2 Level to Knowledge rolls which will come into play more with the feat taken at 1rst level to add more damage to combat. But also Bard gives performances at later levels and could be used to help buff the party. ![]()
Caryth Derellis wrote: At one point I was going to make a half-elf investigator with pretty much zero combat capability and just max out my skills as the entire focus of my character and just RP it up because I am sick of all the crap listed previously. I may end up doing that next and see what happens. Not sure, the Dungeon-dex is a good character to play, it gives intel but it could also result in problems as if you roll to high on the knowledge rolls, or any other skill check you could make him start giving more information then he wants to give. The others posts who claim he might be too attached may be right. He is also probably wanting to GM for those people who are rather new or don't do anything but bare minimum for character development because it is an easier job. Basically to keep a barbarian entertained for combat make the AC reasonable and the HP high and the Barb will have fun hacking away at the meat block in front of him. For your characters it may be that you know too well how to bring them down and so he feels that combat is not taking as long as it should. ![]()
Caryth Derellis wrote:
Yeah consider my advice about the thick book and the side of his head. This is pretty bad (if true) ![]()
Caryth Derellis wrote:
Then a bard is gonna piss him off more I think. Sounds like he sees you are trying to take all the fun. All the Damage and all the Talking, why do the others show up to be your backup dancers? I don't see if that way but I can get the viewpoint. But the way you spoke made me think that you just recently got into the RP as heavily. Just talk to him, explain your not trying to take away everyone else's enjoyment. But also, be a little firm and make sure if this is gonna be a Witch hunt then have your witch begin falling back when combat hits, don't talk to the NPCs and so forth. Pull your character back and when the PARTY begins to notice the loss explain to them why, the GM is singling you out so you are not gonna do anything to get singled out. Bet the party has words with him about it. ![]()
Caryth Derellis wrote:
Yeah if it is as bad as that then you need to quit the group. If he is giving out special perks to everyone else and punishing you. He is being passive aggressive and is trying to make you want to quit. You can quit and call him a dick or make him the dick. Make a character that is a downright copy of a other players former character, down to copying the sheet if they still have it. Let that player know of course and when the GM starts complaining about it just give that player a look like 'See?' it will spread through the group of players that yeah he is indeed singling you out and if you are using someone elses character that is NOT optimized then it shows it even more. Or you know.. take a nice thick hardback version and slap the s%~$ out of him with it till he learns his lesson lol. ![]()
The problem when you say you like to Optimize is that people assume Pun Pun when you say that. People assume you are looking through every book, every minute detail and trying to exploit every rules folly. Loads of them presume that is what people mean by optimizing. Some GMs consider optimizing if you build toward a goal that makes you better. I mean if we break down the term picking a Greatsword over a Longsword is optimizing to some small degree. For this situation yes do go and talk to the GM, explain your problem and ask what his views on. If things don't get better make it a point to the other players that he is singling YOU out and see if they feel the same. If you bring a completely worthless character to the table and he is still giving you crap about it make it known to them that this is vindictive. Because when you leave he will likely just move on to one of them to vent any frustration out on. But yes pick up a support class, I love them but I know some people don't like to shine. I can think of several excuses right now for why bards are too OP. ![]()
Dekalinder wrote:
Converting it over, also changing up the Opportunistic Piety ability to make it channeling. And I did not know that, hmm. ![]()
Hello all, Recently my group has changed GMs and the new one prefers the Pathfinder system. While I too love the system we had been playing a 3.5 Based game with Pathfinder material. Well it seems now its going to switch to a Pathfinder based game with 3.5 Material. My character is about to become a level 6 character, our session was last night and we haven't updated characters yet. My class was Factotum, and I have read through some of the forum and people say its a great fit into Pathfinder so I am not too worried about that. But I am stuck on which VMC to use. I am being allowed to retrain all feats to make this work. I have two flaws
And I am human, so with those and the feats gained through normal leveling I would have 5 feats if I lose my 3rd level feat to VMC. Now I am heavily focused on using Knowledge rolls, I had Knowledge Devotion and I think I will be keeping it. This feat in short makes use of knowledge rolls to deal extra damage. My two main options for VMC is the Bard and the Magus.
Any advice for me? Im Batman has not created a profile. |