Its my general understanding that the tier 1 classes in pathfinder is magic users, how do you think this will be done in pathfinder online ?
Nox Aeterna wrote:
Yeah this specifies it for eidolon. Actually since they have to specify it like this, it is logical to assume its possible ride smaller mounts (not for the eidolon to choose but for others) Why else the need to specify this Nox Aeterna wrote:
A giant on a horse, if the horse can carry him weightwise and the giant has the rideskill...still abit weird.
It defines whats suitable as a mount , not that the mount you ride must be larger then you. So a medium sized mount say a pony is then classified as an unsuitable mount for a medium sized character. From rules:
So the human can ride the pony but with minus 5.
Is my logic flawed ? What do You think?
Can a Medium sized character riding a medium sized mount? For example can a medium sized dwarf ride a medium sized pony ?
If so , can the dwarf do so without - ride checks ? In beastiary:
But dwarf is medium sized. Can another medium sized characters also ride ? Say a human?
Yes i have seen many say that but thats just a subjective opinion not an official rule. As you say if the horse is not heavy the word should be removed , if its supposed to be heavy it should tell what a heavy horse is. As its now it states its a heavy horse but its nothing heavy about it if it just uses the druid horse companion stats.
Hi, i play a paladin and stumbled upon a rare? combination. A paladin using the noble scion feat:
And the paladin archetype Sword of Valor ability First into battle:
Question is , does this stack? Cheesy? |