Richard Edwards's page

We have been playing the new Pathfinder Savage Worlds, which has translated Rise of the Runelords and soon Curse of the crimson Throne.

I’ve been buying Pathfinder 1st edition PDFs as source material as we learn about Golarion. Both Pinnacle and Paizo have gained from my crossover business.

Now we are very interested in Kingmaker! We were heartened to see the multiple Bestiaries for Pathfinder 1st edition and D&D 5E, but very sad not to see a Savage Worlds Bestiary. This is really stopping us from diving even more deeply into Paizo’s new material.

I hope that they will release a Savage Worlds Bestiary for Kingmaker someday. And keep SW in mind when it comes to future systems to support for new material.

A week ago I send customer service an email, but have had no response, so I'm posting it here. Text of my email below.

I just received a package for my Order 4618965.

The shipping list shows the order correctly: "Pathfinder Battles: Iconic Heroes Set #6".

However, the contents of the box was "Pathfinder Battles: Iconic Heroes Set #7."

You've shipped the wrong item.

Can you please send me the correct item that I ordered?

Pathfinder Battles: Iconic Heroes Set #6.

Thank you.

Our local gaming group (Olympia, WA) is hosting a small gaming con in October and since several of us are enjoying the Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, I am thinking about sponsoring a "tournament" and could use some advice.

My current thought is to allow any group from 1-6 players sign up. They run their characters through all 8 of the current scenarios (3 from Perils of the Lost Coast, 5 from Burnt Offerings).

They record the number of character deaths, the number of failed scenarios, and the number of cards left in the Blessings deck when they succeed.

The team with the fewest failed scenarios wins. In the case of a tie (which is likely if more than one get through with no failed scenarios) then the one with the fewest character deaths wins (and again, this may result in ties), in which case the one with the most Blessing cards total from all won scenarios wins (this should definitely break any ties).

Does that sound fun? Fair?

If they want to "fail" scenarios in order to keep characters alive or build up boons, they will lose to parties who go for it and win straight through. If the party has any characters killed, they just replace the lost characters and keep going IF the rest of the group wins the scenario. Total Party Kills have to start over at scenario 1!

Does that sound reasonable? Any suggestions?

Thanks!

joyfully,

Rich

To borrow a question I also have from BGG:

"On the Scenario card for Approach to Thistletop it says that the difficulty to defeat goblins is increased by 1d4. Does that mean you roll a d4 at the beginning of the scenario (say, getting a result of 3) and then all goblins are +3, or does it mean you roll each time you encounter a goblin? I think probably the latter but it's a bit unclear.
Thanks!"