Rathlean's page

I know I am reposting myself, but my initial post got buried under the thread-hijack about alignments.

I know in D&D 3.5 there was a feat called "Versatile Unarmed Strike" that allowed the player to choose what damage type they were doing with their unarmed strikes, in the way that it is done in real life.

I see that there are a lot of feats that allow you to change it to one particular type, but none that allow the same versatility. Was that feat ignored and replaced by these other feats because it was considered too powerful?

Personally, I think getting the choice of all 3 types for the cost of a feat is fairly balanced. I could also see how making that versatility a special quality of the Monk's Unarmed Strike class feature would be appropriate to the class.

I know in D&D 3.5 there was a feat called "Versatile Unarmed Strike" that allowed the player to choose what damage type they were doing with their unarmed strikes, in the way that it is done in real life.

I see that there are a lot of feats that allow you to change it to one particular type, but none that allow the same versatility. Was that feat ignored and replaced by these other feats because it was considered too powerful?

Personally, I think getting the choice of all 3 types for the cost of a feat is fairly balanced. I could also see how making that versatility a special quality of the Monk's Unarmed Strike class feature would be appropriate to the class.

Sorry if this post is in the wrong spot. I'm new to the boards, and it's 2:30 in the morning, I've been reading for 3 hours trying to find a Pathfinder version of this feat, and I'm tired and going to bed.