OK. So let's kick off a session 0 then.
-----
First:
It appears that some spoiler tags we are expected to open and read, and others we are not unless we have access. How do we tell the difference?
Is it based on which character posted the spoiler? Things posted by AP Edgelord shouldn't be opened without permission, but things posted by Skill Challenge should?
Or is it based more on the label of the spoiler? Something along the lines of: open it if it doesn't have a character's name or a check with a DC listed.
-----
Second:
AP Edgelord wrote:
That said I do temper NPC responses to both the words you use and the recognized die rolls of skill challenges.
This is somewhat concerning to me.
When rolling checks, you roll the check first, then describe the action. And it should be just that - a description of the outcome of the roll. It shouldn't affect the outcome of the roll.
We see this with things like Long Jump over a gap. You roll the Athletics check, then role-play the outcome of the result. Same with an attack roll. You roll the attack, then describe the outcome of the attack.
It should be the same with social skills. You roll the check, then describe the in-game events. And the description of the action should match the outcome of the roll - not influence it.
At least, that is how I have always played it. Hearing that I may end up getting double penalties for a failed roll - one for the outcome of the roll and a second one for playing out the failed roll accurately - is a bit of a problem.
Should I instead be role-playing the roll as though it was a success? Even though we all know that it wasn't.
------
Third:
How much of a pompous know-it-all do you want me to be here on this discussion thread? Because I absolutely can be if that is what you want.
But I don't really find that to be fun. And I really don't want to get into a competitive rules-reading battle of wits with the GM. That doesn't sound like fun at all.