The errata relevant for my printing (2nd) doesn't fix it, but since the bestiary says they can't do the counterspell thing, that's probably the interpretation to take.
In fact, it's not fixed even in the prd. The page 554 version and the page 221 version.
EDIT: I've got a pdf
I think I'm cnfused, because the links you posted just hours ago both say the same thing.
From your first link:
Spell-Like Abilities (Sp): Spell-like abilities, as the name implies, are magical abilities that are very much like spells. Spell-like abilities are subject to spell resistance and dispel magic. They do not function in areas where magic is suppressed or negated (such as an antimagic field). Spell-like abilities can be dispelled but they cannot be counterspelled or used to counterspell.
From your second link:
Spell-like abilities are subject to spell resistance and dispel magic. They do not function in areas where magic is suppressed or negated. Spell-like abilities cannot be used to counterspell, nor can they be counterspelled.
So... how was this not fixed in the PRD? Am I missing something?