Provos's page

I was using the Google Drive of assets as well and was foolish to not make a copy. I requested access via google drive but I got no reply.

DayZ does a great scary night time. The rain added to it and the constant chance of zombies you get an intense gameplay.

I don't see why they have to have different grades of raw material. I think that the quality should be based on the refinement.

Thanks for another interesting episode.

I say declare it now put in writing. Then have Nihimon's list it and put it on PFOFan.com as a group and add it to their wiki. Good luck anyone trying to claim it is theirs when you control the name in so many places. Plus if you name and CC are awesome you may start to draw a number of people interested in joining you.

Mint scented bathroom biscuits?

I have followed the converstion until here. :)

I considered the background drift towards "good-lawful" and come to the conclusion that frequency of pvp + -ve change to alignment just needs a standard/constant/consistent background for everyone instead of a "grind x for +ve alignment". Initially I wondered if proactive +ve alignmnent actions would be included, but assume this is the main reason? Or a +ve would ultimately cloud the "ad hoc" pvp-slippery slope?

Thanks for the fix and the great site!

Your wiki entry on pfofan.com is very nicely done.

The biggest problem with the wiki is that the link for the CC opens in the same frame and the text is then unreadable. What I mean is the black background from the wiki stays and the page from paizo.com loads in the table area. The text from paizo.com is black and the black background add to an unreadable state.

I fould out I could set it up my own so I took care of Hearthguard.

and the dot closer to the center of the compass represents neutral.

I am glad people caught on to my "moral compass". :-)

We are technically still in a ice age as long as there are polar ice caps. The ice age has to end at some point.

I was thinking something like a compass shape with n/s being l/c and e/w being g/e. I think reputation should be a slider -1 to 0 to 1 type thing.

I think this is a great idea that has come to soon. I don't know about you but having to remember a deal I made a year and a half ago isn't going to be easy.

Most of the concerns still are just being restated over and over again. We will know nothing more until the next blog.

Name: Hearthguard
Alignment NG
Focus honor, camaraderie, craftsmanship
Timezone: ALL
Link: http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2pe2e?Chartered-Company-Hearthguard

I purposely didn't quote provide quotes or links to the negativity I have seen on these forums. I could provide links to several really poorly thought out threats but I am trying to be a voice for positivity. GW need constructive criticism not "ragequit" statements.

We donated for specific rewards and addons on the kickstarter. We are being allowed to give suggestions and ideas as part of the GW Crowdforging. GW has given us many insights into the game and have even changed things that we have suggested needed looking into. Lets just try to keep this a positive experience that way maybe other companies will give us a chance to be so involved in the future.

I am rather excited PFO and I can understand people being passionate about PFO. The one thing I think people need to do is relax a bit. There are so many post that just so angry and negative it make me not want to keep reading about this game and just wait until EE to come back to the board.

There is no need to threaten GW with pulling your funding. That is a rather immature thing to say. They are allowing us to give input into the product they are making. We should be grateful for this opportunity.

The blogs released by GW will not completely cover every angle on every topic. There is no way for them to do this without taking away from actual product development. They are providing us with an insight to what that are doing. Again we should that graceful for the insight into the process.

We should give the development team the benefit of the doubt when it come to game balance. There is no way they want to create a game that will not be enjoyable and fair. There will have to be compromises on all sides to find a good middle ground that make the game work.

TL/DR Please try to refrain from angry posting. Let keep this community working together nicely.

I have used dual monitors for many years. Most games I have to just shut off the second screen to avoid accidentally clicking outside the game. Dual displays work great for vtt games though.

I cannot wait to start playing.

While I do find the rare and uncommon races intersting, I would prefer that PFO stick to the core races. I am not looking to paint the developers into a corner with asking for the core races to be developed first. I just want to have the option to play what I want to play from the beginning of the game. I have pledged to the kickstarter and I get a reserved name, that name will not work on all races just one. How silly would it look for a gnome name on a dwarf? I mean they're close enough, right?

I am just sharing my opinion that before any of the option they gave us to choose from I would prefer the 7 core races. I understand that EE is not the completed game. That is why I am suggesting what I would prefer them to focus on for EE.

I am glad I am not the only one who thinks this should be a priority.

I like that GW is doing crowdforging. It make me feel like I am part of the development team. To that end I beleive that before pets, god, or mounts/fast travel lets get the rest of the core races in the game. Hell, the halfling lost by four votes it that doesn't show how important the different races are nothing will. With the three halves(half-elf, half-orc, and halflings) totaled it was well over 500+ people asking to do different races.

That is my vote for the next thing to add to the game. I want all races available for Beta.

Dont for get that it covers other compainions that will follow you. Mules for gear and mercs for war, etc.

For some reason people think that fast travel and mounts are the most important. I wonder if even a quarter of them read any of the posts before voting? I think using what could almost be a directory term like pet put people off even looking at it.

I will put my favorite make on Andius' op. This is an important decision that needs to be made very clear.

Anyone got change for a kidney? :P

I do agree on one bounty per body. Spamming bounties is griefing, period.

So what you are saying Dario is that no matter what system is used to help control griefing it will not work. So why bother playing at that point?

Very good work.

The Shieldmate thing allows people who are new to get all the daily deals.
See this link for help

Kidnap and randsom could be great features. Taking the head of a guild and trying to arrange payment without being captured yourself would be fun. So would tying someone up and dropping them in a goblin camp.

I notice on my "my accounts" there is a "My Pledge Drive" where we will be able to claim our Kickstarter pledge items.

I had to ask thanks for a reply.

Your puny jail can't hold me copper!!!

I like everything in the op. No where was it stated how long the person should be in jail or that it couldn't be fun somehow. If I play an evil character I would be bragging about the number of times incarcerated. I am assuming all alignments would look a capture/kill in different ways. The idea of capture/jail is very logical from a LG standpoint. There is a lot of information to take in and try to see the fun and thought put in to it.

I understand I cannot give MY pdf's away. I was hoping for something like a "claim code" like you mentioned or that Paizo directly could give the pdf's away for me. I am not even asking for them to do it in my name. Maybe the randomly choose someones wishlist and if one of the pdf's is on it they give it to them from an anonymous donor.

I am sure I am not the only person who don't need all the pdf's from the kickstarter. That seems like a lot of wasted free pdf's that could go to someone who wants them.

I have pledged for the PFO Kickstarter and will be getting a lot of 3rd party pdf's. I already own the ones I am interested in and I have the Core rulebooks as well. I was hoping there is a way I can donate these unneeded pdf's somehow.

Update Dec. 4 2012: The unsupported 64-bit Windows web player is not currently in working state in Unity 4.0.

Here is a Link

Provos wrote:

This doesn't work in IE9 64, I got it to work in IE9 32.

Did for me, very nicely in fact.

OK, what did I do wrong then? I would appreciate the help.