Kexle
|
I'm going to be picking up a King Maker campaign as the DM in a couple months. We are in the middle/end of the second book, if that matters. I haven't started reading them yet. I want to make sure things are going to go as currently planned before I jump in. However....
A new character is joining the party and wants to play a bard that goes into Master Spy.
As far as I can tell, by RAW, Versatile Performance(Act (Bluff,Disguise)) is not sufficient to qualify the character for the PrC. He needs 7 ranks in Bluff and Disguise, not the ability to replace them with 7 ranks in Perform(Act).
However, as a game balance issue, do you see any problems in me, as the DM, allowing 7 ranks in Perform (Act) to satisfy those two requirement?
My point of view is as follows:
1. The feat requirements (Deceitful and Iron Will) are steep enough.
2. Requiring him to take 7 ranks in each of those skills, when he already plans on replacing them with versatile performance seems like a total waste of 14 skill points.
3. The PrC seem a little underpowered to me, especially since it does not improve the character's bardic music or spellcasting.
4. With the above in mind, I feel it is reasonable to allow the character to use versatile performance in place of the two skill requirements.
I would like to know if anyone else has an opinion one way or the other. Before I make up my mind, I would like to get whatever insight the internets has to offer.
Please don't tell me that by RAW he can't. I know that. I am simply wondering if things would break if I exercise my right as a DM to allow cool things to happen.
Bonus Question. If you think that it would be acceptable to allow versatile performance to take the place of those two skill rank requirements, is it also then reasonable to change the feat requirement to alertness (bonus to perception and sense motives (the other required skills)) in place of deceitful (bonus to bluff and disguise, which will be replaced and hence not ever used)?