In the part where runelords mounted on dragon attack the party, the book mention "a risen Runelord of Greed named Atharend", but according to the runelord legacy article appearing in the first book of return of the runelords, there is no runelord of greed named atharend, the only runelord named atharend is the second runelord of gluttony : "2: ATHAREND –6258 ar to –6150 ar (male, 108 years)"
So my question is : is it an error on the school mentionned, and the book wanted to mention the runelord of gluttony ? Is is juste a mistake on the name, and this runelord was in fact an other runelord of greed ? Is it something else ?
Thanks in advance for the response