| Monoxide3009 |
What kind of golem was this?
It was an example, but it was based off of a Clay Golem, I just forgot the /adamantine.
I think you gave the best response. I believe that both the players and I were correct, we were both just thinking about it in different ways. While they were arguing that it "overcomes damage reduction" as a whole (which is incorrect), the spell could still be used for what they were trying to accomplish. I realized later (when I wasnt able to edit) that I didnt fully state the players argument.
The player using it responded to me with "The enemy is 15/bludgeoning damage, so I am using versatile weapon to overcome bludgeoning damage reduction." Which is incorrect to your point of "resistant to everything except X". My players struggle with this differentiation. However, after I thought about it, he was just 'using it wrong' opposed to the spell not working for the purposes he needed.
Don't overthink it.
Not really over thinking it - I get the wording of DR - thats just how I would describe it in my head.