Alright - the % difference between the "Extra gold per encounter" for Fast, Medium, and Slow remains fairly consistent: Max 100% 86% 58%
The Average *Total* extra gp per level is rather consistent:
Given this info it might be wiser for players in Slow (and maybe Medium) games to tend towards permanent items over consumables, but the difference isn't that extreme, and doesn't exacerbate as you go to higher levels.
Erik Mona wrote:
Thanks for the update Erik! And for everyone else - I think we had better relax a bit on this. We shouldn't mount too much pressure for a decision now for an issue that is a year away. Where would we choose, right now, to be on the safe side? It'll be a huge decision if Pathfinder stays 3.5 (the right one in my mind, but still huge), and we should give Paizo the time to make the right choice for them, and us. ... and as for Microsoft comparisons, I'd say 4E is a lot closer to ME than Vista.
Sexi Golem 01 wrote:
I had never noticed that either - thank you! Also, it's quite possible you can only make one attack per round with Produce Flame, as a touch spell. Alternatively, Flame Blade is used like a scimitar, and thus would get iterative attacks.
Reckless wrote:
Wow Reckless - you nicely summed up my feelings just about perfectly. WOTC lost most of my respect when they pulled Codemonkeypublishing.com's license to produce E-Tools, and the rest with Dragon and Dungeon. They're simply obsolete now, at least to me. I'll fully support Paizo, unless/until they switch to 4.0. After that, like you said, I'd understand, but wouldn't be a market. |