Loxsis's page

The value of a wiki is generally in the amount it covers; splitting data into many devalues them all. People usually don't post their homebrew in several different places. Occasionally others do for them, though usually without giving credit - I've read this can be a problem at the D&D wikis.

But if there really is no such wiki out there then you might try asking at GitP, minmax as well as at the Paizo forums.

Edit: Just checked dandwiki & saw this page there. I think the reasons not to do this that I named in the first paragraph hold.

Well I guess we should go tell D20PFSRD/Archives that they need to duke it out for who gets to host the content, huh? I will continue to update my website as long as homebrewers let me. I see no need for your negativity with my website, I appreciate your concern but it comes unwarranted.

How is this different to dandwiki.com, dnd-wiki.org and their assorted kin? i.e. why does it exist?

On neither website you mentioned did I find a Pathfinder specific section. I would also like to mention, even if there was already a website that did this why try and put down someone's fun project?

Avanish wrote:

Lazaryus wrote:

I'm working on the Specialist, but if I can get it done and polished, you can put it on your site.

I really enjoy the concept of a specialist. However, I can't seem to get your Homebrew links to work.

Is it the Homebrewery link or the link to go to the thread?

The Homebrewery link.

I'm working on the Specialist, but if I can get it done and polished, you can put it on your site.

I really enjoy the concept of a specialist. However, I can't seem to get your Homebrew links to work.

I am currently building up a list of player created content to display in a manner similar to d20PFSRD. I am not trying to make any money or steal anyone's intellectual property, I am trying to create a database for players and GMs to find interesting content.

I am looking for more content to add and a few reliable people to help with updating it. Please let me know if you would like to help at loxsis.pathfinder@gmail.com

Also, any feedback and constructive criticism is welcome.

https://sites.google.com/site/archivesofloxsis/

All credit will be given to the individual that created the content by any means they request.

A Wysp familiar would be great... provided they provide familiar rules for these...

Reviving an old thread but wanted everyone to know that they gave Kineticists two wild talents to get a familiar/improved familiar.

Improved Familiars can only be small elementals or wysp of your element type

So I understand how both work, I have a question about how they interact. If I cleave from A to B and kill A, I should then get to use my Cleaving Finish on either B or C while still getting to continue my original cleave attack correct? I need an official answer on this as my GM does not agree

Mark,

I have a question about replacing Utility/Infusion Wild Talents

At 6th, 10th, and 16th levels, a kineticist can replace one of her utility wild talents with another wild talent of the same level or lower

and

At 5th, 11th, and 17th levels, a kineticist can replace one of her infusions with another infusion of the same effective spell level or lower

Is there any plans to alter this to being more in line with a fighters ability to replace combat feats?