Gary not only gave me a chance, he listened to what I had to say, gave me council, and protected me from a lot of s#*~tiness. He tried to help Crystal as much as what little power he had could do. He was someone I looked up to and he taught me some things about being good to people as a manager and not just as a person. How to spend your capital wisely. After I left Paizo, I didn't see him much, but his presence here was always felt. It worked for a kinder Paizo and a kinder Forum. Part of him will live on in this community for as long as it exists and I hope that's a good long time. Rest in Peace, my friend and mentor.
Freehold DM wrote:
Yeah, Mom has had a few close calls, and same with Owen. That I-35 corridor between south OKC and Norman has had a few problems but most of the damage in oklahoma has been up near the Tulsa area from what I've gleaned. One came out near the OKC/Moore are pretty much after everyone had said it was just going to be severe thunderstorms most likely and just back-built very quickly to a tornado. Very little warning and a lot of people had gone to sleep by the time that happened. Could have really caused some damage if it had stayed around. A lot of states further out have been hit harder than usual.
captain yesterday wrote:
Yeah, I mean I am being paid a ridiculous amount of money as a swarm lead for a company that is about as progressive as a fortune 500 company can be. Writing technical docs, mentoring people, helping move stuff forward. It's a good deal. Crystal is writing graphic novels these days and working a day job. Her Wikipedia entry is missing some stuff. https://www.amazon.com/Cheer-Up-Pompoms-Crystal-Frasier/dp/1620109557/ref=s r_1_1
It's really the dishonesty of it all that really bugs me. It's use in art is largely atrocious. It's practical uses could be interesting if they were at all honest about it's capabilities and were ethical in the sourcing of their models, but largely they are not either. And it's frustrating being in technology watching companies throw money at a glorified database query that is often enough wrong with authority.
Drejk wrote:
Oh yeah f*ck AI, honestly. Plagiarism machines, every last one of them.
Pretty sure there are specific timeouts for My Account items for increased security on that part. You have to prove you are who you are to, for instance, change your password or order or cancel a product or get access to identifiable information. It's fairly common or was fairly common, for certain things in various web platforms to allow you to use a lot of different functions and then have to prove you are who you are for things that need to be more secure. Also, pretty sure the site has been like that for a decade at least on purpose because of standards for credit cards and such. Personally identifiable information should be extremely secure on any site that takes credit cards. Though if it logs you out, ie, going back to just the normal forums requires you to login, that might be a bug but it could also be increased security, ie, the authentication cookie is removed and reauthentication is required at that point, which would be an easy way of accomplishing that and adding security that says, if you can't login here, you shouldn't have access to anything else at this point either which I could see being reasonable.
Realize that convention issues are more than just, "I didn't get to go." GenCon is a place where you can meet fans, talk with industry professionals that will help you develop your career, and team building among colleagues. Being effectively banned from professionally attending GenCon is detrimental to your career both in and out-of-house.
I think one of Paizo's ongoing problems here is that this is just some of the stuff that's happened. They've crystalized around these couple of big things, but there's more and some of them are lesser but longer term. I know there are tales from certain former employees that probably won't see the light of day unless they do. There are other things out there that have the potential to come up and that's where the continuing problems will lay. There is potential for them to keep coming up and Paizo just be a consistent holding pattern so that the good they do is constantly chopped off at the knees by old patterns of abuse. It's a problem.
MadScientistWorking wrote:
Lu is the best. They're a go-getter too. Whoever hires/hired them will be lucky to have them.
MadScientistWorking wrote:
Oh this was a long time ago. Well before 2e. But to be fair, I would have taken a heavier hand. For better or for worse. We disagreed. It was fairly amicable. Chris and Sara did their best and we all appreciate that even if we disagreed on the extent to which the hand of moderation should be applied. But, it certainly wasn't pleasant in the years after to have to endure those comments anytime we included a queer NPC. Which we did often.
You know how exhausting it is for people to constantly debate whether you should exist or not as a valid debate topic and when you point that out have your hands slapped away from the forum controls? Oh, yeah, I do. It's terribly exhausting. -_- On a side note, maybe just listen to your trans-employees when they say they feel attacked and treat the topic as you would anyone actually attacking other employees. Just my two cents.
Of course. People are not a monolith. Also, no one is hiring people just because they can diversify their board without expecting them to do the job. Well, I'm sure someone is, but no one here is asking for that and saying that is just a derailment tactic. People often do, however, hire people based on whether they can identify with them or not, which often translates to skin, gender, etc because they have similar experiences and thus have more in common. And when you get a board where all of the people making all the decisions for the company are white guys in their 40's and 50's, it's a problem. And ignoring that and putting your head in the ground, isn't going to help. People of color, women, lgbtq people are often discriminated against, often unconsciously, often in little ways that reverberate in bigger ways throughout the organization. It takes a conscious effort to unbias yourself in hiring and managing your reports. It just does.
Also, there is no best person for the job. You can't possibly know that. Usually, there are several good choices and you make the best one you can given the data and you can choose to get different voices in the board room or you can choose to go with the guy you want to have a beer with. That is a choice. We make those choices consciously or unconsciously. But the idea that there is one best choice and that guy happens to look just like everyone else in the board room is silly and unrealistic and we should be past that by now. Choose to have a new voice in the board room and I guarantee your choices get more informed.
Diego Valdez wrote: The other is about the leadership team. There IS a PoC who is highly qualified and frankly deserves the promotion on staff. The person currently running the tech team is a woman of color and has done wonders for the tech team and the company. Vic, the CTO, stepped back in the first half of 2020 and since then she has run the tech team. She was the tech team manager before that but since then has stepped up in that void. At the time I left in September there was no CTO in place and the plan was to hire a new CFO and that person was going to double as CTO. It's mind boggling to me that they were choosing to double up those roles rather than offer it to someone immensely qualified and competent. That even in looking to expand the leadership team they still didn't consider her is pretty telling. This. I've heard nothing but good things about the manager who took over the team after I left. I wish I had gotten to meet her before I left but the toxicness of my relationship with the then manager was... epically bad. Paizo, as a company, would probably cease to exist in a meaningful way without them.
Also, I'd like to say, as long as I'm posting to the forums today. Way to freaking go all! You did the hard thing and have at least partially pulled it off! It's a great day for Paizo. Finally, employees will have some say and real way to air grievances and work with management to solve the hard problems. I've bought a shirt and a mug and hope for the best for the Golems. Bread for all, and roses too!
thunderspirit wrote:
There are a lot of managers at Paizo. And, as has been mentioned elsewhere, not everybody was comfortable with their name on the internet.
I'm not sure what it's like now, but those two being gone would have meant about half of the CS staff. The thread lock and banhammer buttons were ever coveted only a few people had them and even less were allowed to use them. And GenCon is going on. Not sure what's happening there but the way the registers tie in to Paizo was something they had to be on the ball for, especially for big release stuff. I imagine that CS is busy and there is less staff attached to computers now than there usually are.
The setting is what makes Pathfinder great. Rules are rules. Some people will like them, others will find ways to do their own thing: house rules, 3rd party publishers, whatever. You can pick and choose the rules all you want. They are really selling you Golarion or the-mystery-of-what-happened-to-space-golarion. It's in the pathfinder/starfinder society. It's in all the books after the rules. It's in everything they produce because that's what's important. Rules are rules, but Golarion is the magic that binds it all together, this world built by a 100 authors and everyone who plays and reads all the flavor text.
Sara Marie was always an advocate for her people. She stood up for their needs and made sure they got as much as she could for her team. Something that makes a great manager. I think she was easily one of the hardest workers there. Diego is a f@%~ing lion with the heart of a colossus. Paizo will be diminished without them there.
|
