| Erfar |
So according to rules
• Bow(crossbow) is a weapon so you could apply poison to it (CRB 550) [An injury poison is activated by applying it to a weapon or ammunition, and it affects the target of the first Strike made using the poisoned item. ]
• You may use a bow to Strike target (CRB 471) [Roll the attack roll for the weapon or unarmed attack you are using]
• Strike with bow usage deal piercing damage (CRB 282)
My POV to ruling is.
• You could poison Bow OR arrow
• Poisoned bow use standard rules for poisoned weapon (lost poison on anything but failure with strike) and arrows get same benefits from poison as from any bow enhancement.
• Poisoned arrow lost regardless of hit or miss target, but you could prepare more poisoned ammunition ahead of time.
Reason:
• That make general usage of poison with range weapon not less effective then with meele or throwing weapon (like returning shuriken/starknife)
• It allow to use "high risk - high reward" tactics in addition to general usage
But I meet idea that you can't poison ammunition-weapon or get anny benifit from it because "you hit with arrow not a bow" but I can't find anything that proof that POV.
