Levi Kornelsen's page

There's so much flying around these boards now, that doing so would be someone's fulltime job. While I agree that it's a great resource for individuals to use for houserules, etc, I think the focus should be on the design of PRPG. Perhaps some fans could volunteer to do the compilation, but I'd hate to see one of the Paizo guys' time used on it instead of the real content.

*Organising* it would be a fulltime job, yah.

I'm just suggesting this: Let us say we have Bob. Bob is going to be reading through all the threads. Bob, seeing ideas he's interested in checking against the real game, adds one step: He copy-pastes those posts into a notepad.

And that's all, for now.

Later, when the game is basically done-ish, Bob has what amounts to a book worth of optional rules. Like, right there.

...

On the other hand, you might be right. A fan-volunteer-type-thing might work better. I'm just spitballing, because I've seen a lot of really smart, savvy ideas get tossed around here.

There are a LOT of great suggestions on this board, proposed rules, shout-outs to other Open Content that might be useful, all that. Some of it won't get used, despite being really good, because it doesn't fit overall, or goes too far from the idea. And that's fine.

But why waste it?

I'd suggest scooping it up with a big shovel while it's going on, taking the stuff that doesn't get used, and making a big fat PDF full of cool "rules optional" material.

I'm nitpicking, here. Just wanted to acknowledge that upfront.

In the open content declaration, when naming the closed content, the word "concepts" is in the list without qualifier. That's a really, really broad word; I'm not at all clear on what it means in context. I suspect that clarifying that would be helpful.

There, nitpick made.

Now, as to the content declaration in general? I say this:

Paizo, I take off my hat to you.