Mogmurch

Kargush's page

6 posts. No reviews. No lists. 1 wishlist.


RSS


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Keep half-orcs, but work to remove the implications. I love them as a thing, but the "lul, rape" background should be done away with, as should the "orc are always evil hordes of raping looters barely able to sustain iron-age tech."


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Some things belong in the realm of houserules and optionals. This is one of those things, in regards to PF.


Tectorman wrote:


Different but related, I don’t know how defenses are going to work in P2E, but it annoyed me to no end that Reflex saves and Touch AC both represent you avoiding harm by dodging, but depending on the specific mechanics of whatever incoming harm you might be facing, you might be really good at dodging one kind (a high Touch AC) only to be poor at dodging the other kind (sucky Reflex saves). Or vice versa. They both represent dodging. Why the disconnect?

That's one thing I felt the Star Wars SAGA rpg got right.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

The more I learn, the less I care for the new edition.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Darigaaz the Igniter wrote:


Please DON'T
-Use a skill/save proficiency system similar to how 4th/5th ed D&D have it. It's honestly pretty lame and doesn't let me properly diversify nor specialize my talents.

Per the FAQ, too late.

Quote:
All of the varied systems and formulas for determining your character's bonuses and statistics, like saving throws, attack bonuses, and skills, have been unified in a single, easy-to-use proficiency system based on your choices and your character's level.

Not happy about this. If I want to play 5e, I can go play 5e. I don't need PF to make a clone.


4 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

2 questions in one go.

1: Do the Musket Master's free Rapid Reload (musket) feat also cover double-barrel muskets, axe muskets and hammer muskets?

2: I see that DB muskets have a listed range of 10 feet, vs the 40 feet of regular muskets. DB pistols do not lose range in this fashion, it is intentional or just a typo? And if it's a typo, is there an errata or something available?