Kalador101's page

**** Pathfinder Society GM. 4 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 37 Organized Play characters.


RSS


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I was originally supposed to run the scenario 2 weeks ago, so I was fully prepped on the scenario while playing.


I'd post a 1 Star review, but the neither Safari nor Opera are showing a link to write a review.
The scaling and tactics on this seem quite poor.

Spoiler:

The GM seems to be forced with 2 options:
1) Take the most favorable interpretation of tactics.
2) Simply write off the secondary success condition.

The first will make things very long and quite possibly kill multiple players. The second speeds things up and probably avoids PC death.

My table's GM chose option 2 as they were kind. I'm running in a few weeks and will let the players decide by asking them if they want to risk a TPK or not which will determine how I run it.

We had plenty of healing, but simply failed the initiative roll in the last fight. The only PCs to see the boss where the ones that started in front. 4 rounds later, we were simply doing mop up duty as boss was out of LOS on round 1 with trolls blocking the exit before anyone acted.

The GM slipped and told us the tactics, but we didn't try walking into the middle of the lava just to get LOS back assuming it wasn't around the corner before we acted. I do not blame the GM as their actions were perfectly valid based on the tactics a written.


Hello Gauss,

I think you are misunderstanding. I as a player was arguing that I wasn't allowed to combine the two when the GM was saying he didn't see why I couldn't. I do run, but I'm likely to be significantly stricter in my interpretations on my own characters than on others. I'll take a closer looking at the exact wording of those feats, but based on your feedback, I'm likely to reverse my opinion.

If I had been running, I'd likely had allowed it and looked it up later on. As a player, I'm more likely to disallow myself(not others, just me) and look it up later. I've been only playing PFS for around 6 months (before that it was D&D 3.5 and 4th) and I do not want to develop any bad habits. I regret being the cause of necromancy in the forums.

Regards,


My apologies. I was the player in question refusing to combine the two as I think it is incorrect. I will admit to having thought of Rapid shot and Many shot as 2 different Full Round actions. I have never actually ran a table with the two feats being combined, but based on the feedback here I'll allow others to play their characters in such a fashion. I'm willing to reconsider how I'm running my character if you can provide a reference to prove to me that I'm not cheating.