Jucro's page

5 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


A few weeks ago, on of my team's PL said that he want to make vampire character for his new PC.

So, we talked about that, and i said a little question, just for joke.

I said wrote:

If vampire in running water(at least 2~3 feet deep), he must take damage. That is ture, Right?

So, if hydrokineticist attacks with her water blast to vampire, this blast can be running water?
I think water blast has B attack type and rule says Even the weakest kinetic blast involves a sizable mass of elemental matter or energy
So, i think water blast is big water ball and it's diameter can be 2~3 feet, and if she shoot that, that water ball starts running.

After that, all of my team's Pl and even my DM stopped talking, and everyone confused about that.

One of PL said

He said wrote:
I think that just water ball, and if she shoot that water ball, that ball fly like basketball.

(Me and my teammate aren't english user, so this expression can be weird.)

So, I said

I said wrote:
Ok, then if she use her water blast with infusion like Torrent or Maelstrom, how does it works? Spray infusion just splash water widely, like REAL spray, but Torrent and Maelstrom says "A torrent of energy buffets" or "a 20-foot-radius whirling maelstrom".

And.... no one said about that. So, i REALLY wonder how these works.


Thanks a lot. You kindness people


I confuse kineticist's burn reducing process in Gather power and Infusion Specialization because my first language isn't english.(I'm korean)

Anybody can help me to understand this process?

Gather Power says:
This ability can never reduce the burn cost of a wild talent below 0 points.
and
Infusion Specialization says:
This can’t reduce the total cost of the infusions used below 0.

So, I think 'Minimum Burn cost is 1.'

But in other thread, people and designer say 'If you use Gather Power and Infusion Specialization both in the same time, you can reduce Burn cost to 0.'

I confused because in Eng-Kor dictionary, Below A means "Less than A" and "A or less" both.

What is correct?
You can never reduce burn cost 0 or less.(Minimum 1) or You can never reduce burn cost less than 0.(Minimum 0)

If the latter is correct, can I reduce burn cost to 0 using Infusion specialization only?

* I write this thread using Google Tralnslate, so I think that i make lots of grammatical error.


2 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

Totem Spiritualist archtype's Phantom Animal feature can give Hunter's Animal Focus feature to her Phantom animal.

Description:
The second time it is empowered, the phantom animal gains the hunter’s animal focus class ability, treating the totem spiritualist’s spiritualist level as her effective hunter level.

But I can't know that
"Phantom Animal has an ability that can use Animal Focus feature on herself, if Phantom Animal is Hunter. So, Phantom Animal spend her swift action to use this ability on herself, it's durations are 1 min*her master's spritualist level/day, and This duration does not need to be consecutive, but must be spent in 1-minute increments."

or

"Totem Spritualist has an ability that can use Animal Focus feature on only her Phantom Animal that is empowered twice. So, Totem Spiritualist spend her swift action to use this ability on Phantom Animal, and it has no duration like that Hunter use Animal Focus feature to her Animal companion."

Which is correct?


※ First, my language isn't English. My concern has many grammar error. So, i think you may not understand it. Sorry.

Kinetic Kinght's 1st level Feature, Elemental Blade. it says

Spoiler:
" She can’t use her kinetic blast without the kinetic blade form infusion or an infusion that lists kinetic blade as a prerequisite."

And Kinetic Blade infusion says

Spoiler:
"The kinetic blade doesn’t add the damage bonus from elemental overflow."

My oppinion:
I realized that "This archetype has no discription about Elemental Overflow feature. It means this class will never take damage bonus from Elemental Overflow."[spoiler=Movie plot spoiler]

I think that if Kinetic Knight takes damage bonus from Elemental Overflow, it will not overpowered. Rather, I think it's appropriate balance.

If you do not think so, I think the Knight may give you a different kind of bonus instead of a damage, like AC, save, etc...

But it has no bonus or something. I think it's unfair.

Have you design Kinetic Knight without considering Elemental Overflow?