Rub-Eta wrote:
This really is one of those FAQs where they need to correct strong ambiguity
Another shameless bump for you.
Yeah, it's like REALLY strong ambiguity. I'm relatively new to pathfinder after many years of 3.5 play and I'm thinking about making an unsworn shaman, but I'm hesitating precisely because of this issue. I'll probably just build #2 for now as it has the lowest risk of DM's thinking I'm being too munchkinish, but if #3 or #1 are the intended mechanics then that would completely change the power of the archetype (and arguably the whole class).
