
HillTopper |
7 people marked this as a favorite. |
Personally, I think HWalsh's rewrite has one VERY important benefit to it: reading comprehension. We cannot assume that every person reading this book has a college education. A (hopefully) not insignificant number of people picking up the book are going to be kids who go: "Oh, wow! That Book has a unicorn/dragon/whatever is trendy on it and it looks SO COOL!"
The preponderance of polysyllabic gobbledegook is stilted and open to abuse. By keeping this simple you're more likely to get the "Don't be a jerk" across instead of "Why can't you understand this simple Sociology doctoral thesis, you doubleplus ungood plastatic deplorable?"
tl;dr:
Don't assume that you're writing for people who have the same background as you in political speech. Insisting on in-group social science terminology can be just as off-putting as any slur-laden tirade.