| Game Mechanic |
I would like democratic options, a free market economy, and few to no banned options. Those would dictated by mutual benefit and/or ethics. Democracy I want but people infer that its anarchy.
Count the number of people who have agreed with you in this thread about your proposed changes and count the number who have disagreed, there's a sample of a democratic voting system.
Chaos, whatever it is your seeking you will not find it in PFS. You will not be successful in making any change to the campaign.
In order to enjoy PFS/SFS, you MUST accept the sandbox Paizo and Organized Play team provides.
Chaosticket actually has 18 PFS characters so maybe there is some investment there.
In the future CT might be able to get a tweak to PFS through, but it's going to a lot more knowledge and far more reasoned approach to do so.
If a person does want to make changes to a system, they first need to understand the system. Prove that there is a flaw or shortcoming in the system and then prove that their solution is viable and an improvement to the system. None of which have I seen in this thread.
I think the fundamental problem is that CT still thinks of this in videogame terms where the entire system is designed to serve the one player. Roleplaying games are group activities and the fundamental rule zero of roleplaying games is 'have fun and help others to have fun'. Perhaps if CT GMed a game or two it might bring perspective.