It saddens me that the core PvE fan-base are still unable to give this concept a chance. I am a adventurer, explorer, crafter and I am most looking forward to playing in a world where there is a real risk of losing my gear If I don't use my wits. I wasn't going to back the second kickstarter but I succumbed eventually because I believe in GWs vision. One thing is certain though, If GW give in and change their vision to placate the current sqeaky wheel then I will withdraw my funding. I am backing the current PFO vision, I will not back a watered down carebear version of it.
I will be perfectly willing to give the game a chance when it is released however in its current development direction I am not willing to invest in the possibility that it will truly manage to do what no PvP centric game has managed to date. So far it sounds like they are going for the Ultima Online approach to PvP and to be honest that was one of the ost grief intensive PvP systems I have ever encountered.
Problem I have is I may be willing to give the game a try when it is released however I am not so willing to flutter almost $200 dollars on the hope that this PvP will be different from others.
The inablity to opt out of PvP is for me a deal breaker.
What worries me is how much focus is there on PvP. My primary enjoyment is PvE and I prefer the ability ro opt out of PvP if I do not wish to participate. Much like Star Wars Galaxy handled it.
Pathfinder Society GM. Starfinder Society GM. 4 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 30 Organized Play characters. 
