Frerichs0's page

Frerichs0 wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong but, it says in the player manual about movement rules that Movement is measured in feet(or 5-foot squares) per round. So wouldn't that mean anythibg less than feet(5-foot square) does not count as movment.

It's easy to tell that is the intent because the game references being only able to move 5 feet in several situations, but because it never says "you must move at least 5 feet" they are using that to say you don't have to.

It's similar to the fact that the dead condition doesn't say you can no longer move so technically you can still move even if you are dead.

The difference is that the dead condition and being able to move is often said as a joke, but these people are dead serious about being able to use movement without actually moving 5 feet.

Why they think the developers see this as the intent is beyond me. I was going to start an FAQ, but I don't want to take up the space in the book with errata for something so obvious.

If we change the words movement to foot and foot(5-feet square) to 12 inches then obviously a foot is messured in 12 inches less than that wouldn't be a foot. So wouldn't that place a minimum amount you can move to be counted as movement?

Correct me if I'm wrong but, it says in the player manual about movement rules that Movement is measured in feet(or 5-foot squares) per round. So wouldn't that mean anythibg less than feet(5-foot square) does not count as movment.

Do we really need an FAQ that says you need to move at least 5 feet when you use movement?

If you've read the Facebook post the majority of people actually do think that 0 feet of movement is movement. They are under the impression that since the feat doesn't give a minimal amount they can attack standing still. The same thing about the movement rule after people pointed it out to them. They think their ruling is supported by RAW and that requiring to move is RAI.