Fear of Mind's page

Looking for some verification on an odd combination. If a human druid took the alternate racial trait eye for talent (ARG), would the benefit apply to multiple animal companions gained through the archetype pack lord (UM)? In addition would the benefit apply to a multiclass druid/wizard's animal companion AND familiar?

I tried searching the treads but all I could find was, "Natural Weapons and Manufactured Weapons, Multiattack and Natural Weapons, etc etc etc. The question I have is, if I make a tiefling with the Maw or Claw (maw) alternate racial trait and weild no weapons, does my bite deal 1d6+(1.5str) or just 1d6+(1str)? I'm confused because technically I can still punch with my fists (not a monk so provoking AoOs), but this doesn't mean I'm going to ever use them. I know that once I get Aspect of the Beast (claws) I will only be given 1d6(+1str), but what about before the claws?

I was just curious if this combination was even a viable option. I know in the Blood of Angels companion its states, "Though these features are particularly suitable for aasimars, GMs can permit characters of other races with appropriate back stories or world views to gain them as well." So if a GM allowed a kitsune to take the Wolfscarred Face curse, would the use of its Change Shape (Su) counteract the spell failure chance?

The way I'm looking at it is that it would. Since the curse gives you a muzzle (maybe an even more animalistic than the kitsune already has) that causes a 20% spell failure, and the Change Shape (Su) acts like alter self; this would change the mouth of the kitsune to a human mouth, would it not? Thus having a human mouth would negate the spell failure part of the curse? What do you guys think?

Taking a look through the Pathfinder Companion section today, I noticed that there was only a 3.5 version of Elves of Golarion. Which got me wondering why has Paizo moved onto the featured races (Blood of Fiends, Angels, the Night, etc) when they haven't finished the core races. I know that the ARG covers information on elves, I just enjoy all the info that was presented in the other race books (gnomes of Golarion, dwarves, goblins, etc). So I was just curious to see if Paizo has any plans in the works to update the 3.5 version of Elves of Golarion to the PFRPG standards, and make it worth buying?

New to the board so please forgive me if this sounds ridiculous, and please bear with me on the long explanation. I am currently making a goblin with the Fire Elemental Bloodline for a play the "We Be Goblins" module. And I had a question about casting two spells as a full round action. Using the Core Rulebook, here’s what I’ve found:

“Bloodline Arcana: Whenever you cast a spell that deals energy damage, you can change the type of damage to match the type of your bloodline. This also changes the spell’s type to match the type of your bloodline.”

“Cantrips: Sorcerers learn a number of cantrips, or 0-level spells, as noted on Table 3–15 under “Spells Known.” These spells are cast like any other spell, but they do not consume any slots and may be used again.”

So by using this information I would be able to cast, say acid splash, as many times a day as needed. The spells element would be changed to fire because of the Bloodline Arcana, and would only take one standard action to cast and a free action would be needed to make the ranged touch attack.

Now here’s the actual question: If I take the Two-Weapon Fighting feat, would I be able to us a full round action to cast Acid Splash twice, taking the -2 to both ranged attacks.

Before we jump to the conclusion that Two-Weapon Fighting requires the use of a physical weapon, I quote the book again:

“Touch Attacks: Touching an opponent with a touch spell is considered to be an armed attack and therefore does not provoke attacks of opportunity.”

I look at the fact that they are armed attacks it would be similar to a monk using flurry of blows. So if this would be the case could my goblin choose to negate his move action and instead throw two standard action spells as a full round action using this feat?