Corran54
|
So, long time PFS player, looking at ability scores and credits, I feel like there just isn't enough. Meanwhile Equipment feels unattainable.
I know pathfinder is a different system, but I can't help but draw similarities between the systems, and I decided to make a comparison.
Abilities:
So in starfinder If I build a Human with a Mercenary background I can spend my 10 points to get a build of 16 16 11 10 10 10.
If I build a human in pathfinder using the 20pt buy of PFS I can get
16 16 11 10 10 10 and have 4 points remaining.
In comparison to pathfinder, you abilities are noticeably gimped.
Credits: So a lvl 1 character gets a starting wealth of 1,000 credits in SFS, this seemed really low to me in comparison to the price of equipment. so I took the price of a long sword in both SF and PF and compared them.
Based of this comparison 1 GP = 25 credits, meaning that SFS characters start with an equivalent of 40 GP in credits to buy equipment.
In comparison to pathfinder you start with 1/3 the purchasing power.
Equipment: Not only are things expensive, the level limitations feel harsh. You can buy equipment out of the Core Rule Book that has an item level equal to character level +1. meaning at level 1, you can only buy up to level 2 items. This wouldn't be so bad, but a standard long sword is a level 2 item. Past that, there doesn't seem to be too much that's worth purchasing with an item level of less than 5. To me it just feels like you have no access to better equipment until character level 4.
Anyone else feel crippled when coming from PF to SF?
Disclaimer: I have not had the chance to play any SF and am basing this entirely on how limited I felt in character creation. This is not a complaint about the new system, and I am certain that Paizo has balanced the game the way they wish for it to be balanced. This is only a question of am I the only one that feels like SF characters are much weaker than PF characters.
