Remember the fun time the developers made that mistake with monks flurries, Casuing the sohei archetype and the Zen archer archtype to flat out not work and it contradicted every premade monk character they had. That caused alot of issues. They may have fixed it but in this case they still contradict rules and rules are the only thing I can follow online. If they errated it then that would be fine but in this case? No.
Vidmaster7 wrote: I think there is really nothing more to say on it then. Your going to go with your way no matter what so why argue it? This is part of a the lovely fighter v wizard threads on another board, where everyone says he is wrong. I will keep my way because he cannot prove that by RAW I fall when stunned.
Snowblind wrote:
I don't really care what the FAQ says to be honest, It contradicts the book way to often to be even credible at explaining rules. I follow RAW in internet discussions, not how the desingers think the rules work.
Ok, I am the person who has this conversation with the OP. It was about the fly spell, not flying in general. Cal thinks because the line "Using a fly spell requires only as much concentration as walking, so the subject can attack or cast spells normally." means it takes a action to hover because walking takes a action to use.Iw oudl also like to add home rules dont matter as they vary from table to table so in our discussion we need a strict RAW. I am going for still flying while stunned. |