
ChickieChick |
I beg to disagree. If the one entry that came in 17th (well, 18th actually) had been the top of my "honourable mentions" then if I had dropped a vote from one of my top four that was an obvious slam dunk winner and then placed that one vote on the honourable mention my vote could have been the one that pushed the entry into, at least, a tie for last place. (As it turns out this is a moot point as all eight of my favourites - top three, two "second string" and three "honourable mentions" ended up in the top 16.)
Since Onuyaka is so obviously at the top of this particular heap of villians I feel quite comfortable assuming that he will easily pull off a position in the top three and that losing one vote from me isn't going to irrepairably harm his chances. At worst, I could see the loss of my one vote causing this villian to slide down one run of the ladder but even if he was at 3rd place that still leaves him in the top four. And, as a result, it allows me to give a helping hand to one more submission that I'd personally prefer to see get through more than the others.
:-j(enni)
My point is simply that you (and everyone) should vote for what you feel to be the best entries and not dole out pity votes for your #5 or #6 choices.
You say your 1 vote won't matter, but what if others follow your example and assume that people are "safe"-- and then those "safe" contenders don't advance to the next round?
I'd hate to be the 1 vote that made the difference between quality and crap.
I'm not attacking you, I just don't think a random sampling of opinions on a message board is statistically reliable enough to predict voting patterns. I personally want to vote for the best, and not rely that the ones I like will pull through without my support.